Chattisgarh High Court
Kantii Bai vs (Deleted ) Shyamlal Yadav (Dead ) on 14 March, 2026
YOGESH Digitally signed by
YOGESH TIWARI
TIWARI Date: 2026.03.14
17:39:11 +0530
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Member -Lok Adalat Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate
FA No. 213 of 2012
Kantii Bai D/o Shyam Lal Yadav Aged About 57 Years W/o Janiram
Yadav, R/o Muralidih, Tah. And P.S. Akaltara, Post Office- Amora, Distt.
Janjgir-Champa C.G., Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
1 - (Deleted ) Shyamlal Yadav (Dead ) S/o As Per Court Order Dt. 22-
07-2019., Chhattisgarh
2 - Santosh Yadav (Died And Deleted ) Through Lrs As Per Hon'ble
Court Order Dated 02-03-2026
2.1 - (A) Itwara Bai W/o Late Shri Santosh Yadav Aged About 60 Years
R/o Behind Pursuram Bhavan, Imlipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District-
Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
2.2 - (B) Humendra Yadav S/o Late Santosh Yadav, Aged About 42
Years R/o Behind Pursuram Bhavan, Imlipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil And
District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
3 - Ashok Yadav S/o Shyam Lal Yadav Aged About 45 Years Behind
Parshuram Darmshala, Imlipara, Bilaspur, P.S. City Kotwali, Bilaspur,
Tah. And Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4 - (Deleted ) Shanti Bai Yadav (Dead ) S/o As Per Court Order Dt. 22-
07-2019., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2
5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Collector, P.S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Distt.
Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate
For State : Mr. Ujjawal Choubey, P.L.
For Respective Respondents : Amit Singh, Advocate
Reg. No.C.G./1476/2024/Adv.
District Court, Bilaspur.
AWARD
(Passed on 14.03.2026)
1. The present Appeal has been filed against the impugned
judgment and decree dated 24.09.2012 passed by the Fifth
Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil
Suit No.05-A/2011 whereby the suit preferred by the appellant has
been dismissed.
2. It is submitted that the parties to the present appeal are sisters
and brothers, and the dispute giving rise to the present
proceedings has been amicably settled through a family
settlement between them. Pursuant to the said settlement, the
parties have arrived at a mutual compromise and in view of the
aforesaid family settlement and compromise, the appellant does
not wish to prosecute the present appeal any further.
3. On going through the terms and conditions of the compromise
arrived at between the parties, this Court is satisfied that the same
has been entered into voluntarily, out of free will and without any
coercion or undue influence. The parties, being brothers and
3
sisters, have amicably resolved their dispute through a family
settlement, which appears to be just, fair and lawful. The
compromise does not appear to be contrary to law or public
policy.
4. The parties to the first appeal have filed a compromise
dead/docket duly signed, which was further verified and parties
have unequivocally confirmed the compromise deed/docket
stating that they have settled their dispute outside the Court.
5. Accordingly, the compromise is hereby accepted and taken on
record, and the first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the
compromise arrived at between the parties outside the Court.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Apoorva Tripathi)
Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat
High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
Yogesh
