Kamal Nayan Singh @ Golu vs Unknown on 28 July, 2026

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Kamal Nayan Singh @ Golu vs Unknown on 28 July, 2026

Author: Tirthankar Ghosh

Bench: Tirthankar Ghosh

28.07.2026
Serial no. 276
  [G.S.D]



                                        CRM (M) 1552 of 2026
                  In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                  Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in
                  connection with Jagatballavpur PS Case No. 182 of 2022 dated
                  20.08.2022 being Session Trial No. 277 of 2023 u/s
                  395////120B/ of the IPC & Section 25/ of the Arms Act.
                                           -And-

                 In the matter of : Kamal Nayan Singh @ Golu

                                                                        ... Petitioner(s)
                 Mr. Toslim Ali
                 Mr. S. Bhattacharya
                                                       ... for the Petitioner(s)
                 Mr. Somnath Adhikary
                                                        ... for the State-respondent(s)

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is in custody for three years eight months and

SPONSORED

similarly placed accused person has been granted bail.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer

for bail.

I have taken into account the period of detention of

the present petitioner and without further entering into the

merits of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on

bail as some time will be required to take the trial to its

logical conclusion.

Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is

Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Kamal Nayan Singh

@ Golu shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of
2

Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two

sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each,

one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned

CJM, Howrah.

If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself

physically available on each and every date so fixed by the

learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Howrah

without prior permission of the learned trial court.

Accordingly, CRM (M) 1552 of 2026 is allowed.

If there is any violation of the aforesaid condition,

the learned trial court will not hesitate to cancel the bail

without further reference of this court.

Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly
collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court,
Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance
with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
3