― Advertisement ―

HomeJawaharlal Nehru Technological ... vs Joint Commissioner on 27 April, 2026

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological … vs Joint Commissioner on 27 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological … vs Joint Commissioner on 27 April, 2026

Author: R Raghunandan Rao

Bench: R Raghunandan Rao

                                   1

                                                               RRR,J & TCDS,J
                                              W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

APHC010454232023
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                 AT AMARAVATI                       [3529]
                          (Special Original Jurisdiction)

             MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
                 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

                              PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

              THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

  W.P.No.23535, 31934 of 2023, 7867 and 26414 of 2025 and W.P.9123 of
                                 2026

WRIT PETITION NOs: 23535 of 2023

Between:

  1. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY KAKINADA
     (JNTUK), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,  PITHAPURAM
     ROAD, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT,     ANDHRA
     PRADESH-533 003

                                                         ...PETITIONER

                                 AND

  1. THE   PRINCIAPL   COMMISSIONER   OF CENTRAL  TAX,
     VISAKHAPATNAM CGST COMMISSIONERATE,   GST BHAVAN,
     PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035

  2. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, OFFICE OF
     THE   PRINCIPAL   COMMISSIONER-  OF   CENTRAL    TAX,
     VISAKHAPATNAM CGST COMMISSIONERATE,     GST BHAVAN,
     PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035

  3. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY,
     DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,    MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 128-
     A/NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI
                                         2

                                                                       RRR,J & TCDS,J
                                                      W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

                                                          ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of
‘WRIT OF MANDAMUS’ a)Setting aside the Order-in-Original No. VSP-
CGST-ADC 08-23-24 dt.06.06.2023 demanding Goods and Services Tax for
an amount of Rs. 2,64,87,723/- along with interest and penalties as being
arbitrary, illegal, perverse, and contrary to the provisions of the Central Goods
and Services Tax Act, 2017
and Rules made thereunder. and b)Pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

SPONSORED

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above Writ
Petition, the petitioner prays that this Honourable Court to direct Respondent
No.2 to refrain from recovery of the demands confirmed in the Order-in-
Original No. VSP-CGST-ADC-08-23-24 dt.06.06.2023 passed by the
Respondent No.2 and pass such other order or orders as the Honourable
Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to vacate the interim order passed in LA No. 1 of 2023 in
dt.11.10.2023 in W P No. 23535 of 2023 and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. LAKSHMI KUMARAN SRIDHARAN

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA))

2. SANTHI CHANDRA (Jr. Standing Counsel for CBIC)

Date of Judgment Reserved : 07.04.2026
Date of Pronouncement : 27.04.2026
Date of Upload : 27.04.2026
3

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

The Court made the following common order:

(per Hon‟ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

As the issues raised in all these Writ Petitions are common, they are

being disposed of, by way of this common order.

2. The petitioners, in all these Writ Petitions are Public

Universities, established by the State of Andhra Pradesh, by way of different

Acts. All these Universities have suffered orders of assessment, calling upon

the petitioners to pay GST on the affiliation fees and No Objection Certificate

(NOC) fees received by these Universities, from their affiliated colleges. The

details of the orders of assessment etc., are given herein below:

                                 Name of the        Period of        Date of Order
S.No.        W.P.No.
                                  University       Assessment       of Assessment

                      Jawaharlal Nehru
           W.P 23535    Technological              01/07/2017 to
   1                                                                  06/06/2023
            of 2023  University Kakinada            31/03/2020
                          (JNTUK)

           W.P 31934 Acharya Nagarjuna             01/07/2017 to
   2                                                                  25/08/2023
            of 2023      University                 31/03/2022

            W.P 7867         Adi Kavi Nannayya     01/07/2017 to
   3                                                                  19/11/2024
             of 2025             University         31/03/2022

           W.P 26414 Vikrama Simhapuri             01/04/2019 to
   4                                                                  03/09/2025
            of 2025       University                31/03/2025

            W.P 9123                               01/04/2018 to
   5                          Krishna University                      01/12/2025
             of 2026                                31/03/2024
                                           4

                                                                      RRR,J & TCDS,J
                                                     W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch




3. The petitioners have been established under different Acts. The

details of these Acts are given below:

The Act under which the
Sl.No. W.P.No. Name of the University
University has been established

Jawaharlal Nehru
W.P 23535 Jawaharlal Nehru Technologies
1 Technological University
of 2023 University act, 2008
Kakinada (JNTUK)

W.P 31934 Acharya Nagarjuna Andhra Pradesh Universities
2
of 2023 University Act, 1991

W.P 7867 of Adi Kavi Nannayya Andhra Pradesh Universities
3
2025 University Act, 1991
W.P 26414 Vikrama Simhapuri Andhra Pradesh Universities
4
of 2025 University Act, 1991
W.P 9123 of Andhra Pradesh Universities
5 Krishna University
2026 Act, 1991

4. The assessing authorities in all these cases have sought to tax

the receipt of affiliation fees and N.O.C fees, under the GST Act, on the

ground that the fees had been paid for services rendered by the respective

Universities and the same is taxable under the GST Act. The petitioners had

objected to the said taxation, on the ground that they are universities

incorporated under the respective Acts, passed by the Andhra Pradesh State

Legislature and the affiliation fee and statutory fee collected by them is in

discharge of statutory functions which cannot be treated as supply of services

in the course of business activity. The petitioners also took the stand that
5

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

these fees would fall under Entry No.66 of GST exemption notification No.12

of 2017, dated 28.06.2017, and as such, no GST can be levied on supply of

such services. The assessing officers rejected these contentions on the

ground that any supply of service, even if it is a supply of service, in

pursuance of statutory function, would be taxable, in view of the provisions of

the GST Act. The Assessing Officer further held that the petitioners are not

entitled to the exemption set out under Entry No.66 of Notification 12 of 2017

on the ground that the supply of service of affiliation and issuance of No

Objection Certificates do not fall within the ambit of Entry No.66 of

Notification 12 of 2017.

5. Various ancillary issues on the question of whether Section 74

of the GST Act can be invoked, against the petitioners have also been raised.

All the aforesaid orders are now under challenge in the present Writ Petitions.

6. Heard Sri C. Raghavan Ramabhadran, Sri Shaik Jeelani

Basha, Sri S. Suri Babu, Sri C. Sanjeeva Rao, learned counsel appearing

for the Petitioners and Smt. Shanti Chandra, learned Standing Counsel

appearing for the Respondent.

7. In order to consider the contentions raised by the petitioners, it

would be appropriate that the facts relating to one case be taken up for

consideration. Accordingly, the petition in W.P.No.23535 of 2023 is being
6

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

taken up for consideration. It may also be noted that the contentions

raised by the petitioners are essentially the same.

8. Sri C. Raghavan Ramabhadran, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner in this Writ Petition contends as follows:

A. The petitioner is the Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University,

Kakinada which has been established under the Jawaharlal Nehru

Technological Universities Act, 2008. This University has been established to

have jurisdiction over eight erstwhile Districts of Andhra Pradesh. The said Act

sets out the various functions that will be carried out by the petitioner

university as well as the structure of the petitioner university and other

aspects. The petitioner University has to act in accordance with the UGC

guidelines, which are issued from time to time. Under the relevant UGC

guidelines, no college can admit students without obtaining affiliation from the

appropriate university. All Engineering Colleges, which are sought to be

established and run in the area of jurisdiction of the petitioner university, are

required to obtain affiliation from the petitioner university. Similarly, the

colleges are also required to obtain no objection certificates from the

University for Recognition by the government. The application for grant of

affiliation and for no objection certificates are governed by statute. As far as

grant of affiliation is concerned, the UGC guidelines require Colleges seeking

affiliation to make formal applications and for the concerned universities to

ascertain whether the colleges have necessary infrastructure and faculty for
7

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

conduct of classes. After such examination and verification, the concerned

universities are required to grant affiliation. All these functions are mandatory

and the petitioner university does not have any discretion in the matter. The

petitioner university would have to consider any application made by any

college, within its area, for grant of affiliation and grant such affiliation if all the

conditions necessary for such affiliation are complied or refuse affiliation, if

such conditions are not complied. The grant of affiliation and issuance of no

objection certificates are not voluntary acts by the petitioner university and are

acts, which are regulated and governed by the statute as well as the UGC

guidelines. Another aspect of the matter is that the petitioner university is not a

private organization, but an entity which has been established under a State

Act and is discharging functions, stipulated under the said Act and other

guidelines such as the UGC guidelines. This would make the petitioner

university a government entity or a government authority, for the purposes of

the GST Act.

B. Section 9 of the GST Act provides for levy of tax on supply of

services. The expression supply of services, is contained in the inclusive

definition set out under Section 7 of the GST Act. The said definition makes it

clear that only activities conducted in the course or furtherance of a business

can be categorized as supply of services which are taxable under Section 9.

This is in view of the Definition of business contained in Section 2 (17) of the

GST Act.

8

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

C. A conjoint reading of all the aforesaid provisions and submissions

would make it clear that the petitioner university is not conducting business

nor supplying services in the course of or in furtherance of business. In such

circumstances, there can be no levy of GST under Section 9 of the GST Act.

D. In the alternative, even if the said activities are to be treated as

taxable supplies of service, the same are exempt on account of Entry No. 66

in Notification Number 11 of 2017, dated 28.06.2017. Apart from this there is a

further exemption available under Entry 4 and Entry 5 of notification number

12 of 2017 dated 28.06.2017.

E. Entry No. 66 of Notification Number 1 of 2017 states that any

service provided by an educational institution to its students, faculty or staff

would also be exempt from tax if such service provides for admission of

students to colleges. In the present case, no college can admit students

unless the university has given affiliation to the college. Therefore, the

Admission of students being dependent upon the grant of affiliation,

automatically brings the ground of affiliation within the exempted services

under Entry No. 66.

F. Entry 4 of Notification Number 12 of 2017 exempts services of a

governmental authority, by way of any activity which could be entrusted to a

Municipality under Article 243-W of the Constitution. Similarly, services by a

governmental authority in relation to any function entrusted to a panchayat

would also be exempt. The definition of governmental authority contained in
9

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

that notification at Clause 2(z)(f) and the definition of government entity

contained in clause 2 (z)(f)(a) includes anybody, which is set up under an Act

of a State Legislature. This provision would be squarely applicable to the

petitioner university as it has been set up under an Act of a State Legislature.

Further, the petitioner university is also carrying out the function of the

Panchayaths and Municipalities.

G. These issues have been considered by the High Court of

judicature of Bombay at Goa in Goa University versus Joint Commissioner

of CGST Panjab.1 ; the High Court of Delhi in the case of Central Electricity

Regulatory Commission vs. The Additional Director, DGGI.2 ; The Hon‟ble

High Court of Karnataka in the case of Bengaluru North University vs. Joint

Commissioner of central tax3, and all the High Courts have held in favour of

the Petitioners.

9. Smt. Shanti Chandra, the learned Standing Counsel, on the other

hand, would contend that any supply of service, by a governmental authority is

taxable in view of the provisions of Section 7 as well as Section 2(17) defining

the term „business.‟ She would further contend that the said provisions, when

read together, make out a case where any supply of service by a government

or any governmental authority, would be taxable unless such activities have

been enumerated in schedule-III of the GST Act or where specific exemptions

1
2025 (96) GSTL 513 (Bombay)
2
2025 (95) G.S.T.L. 277 (Del.)
3
2025:KHC:16686
10

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

are granted by the government under the provisions of Section 7(2)(b). She

would submit that since the activities, in question, do not fall under schedule-

III nor has any exemption been given under Section 7(2)(b) of the GST Act,

the contention that the fees collected, for grant of affiliation and issuance of

No Objection Certificates, are taxable.

10. Smt. Shanthi Chandra would also contend that the petitioner does

not get any exemption either under Entry No.66 of Notification Number 11 of

2017, dated 28.06.2017 and or Entries 4 and 5 of Notification Number 12 of

2017, dated 28.06.2017. She would further submit that this issue has already

been considered by the Hon‟ble High Court of Telangana in W.P.No.34617 of

2022 and batch, decided on 17.10.2023. She would contend that the Hon‟ble

High Court of Telangana after considering the very same arguments followed

by the petitioners, in the present case, had rejected these arguments and had

held that there was no exemption, under the aforesaid entries in Notification

Number 1 of 2017 or Notification Number 12 of 2017.

Consideration of the Court:

11. It would be necessary to notice certain provisions of law and

entries in the notifications. Section 2(17), Section 7 and Section 9(1) of the

GST Act read as follows:

2(17) “business” includes—

(a) any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation,
adventure, wager or any other similar activity, whether or not it
is for a pecuniary benefit;

11

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

(b) any activity or transaction in connection with or incidental or
ancillary to sub-clause (a) ;

(c) any activity or transaction in the nature of sub-clause (a) ,
whether or not there is volume, frequency, continuity or
regularity of such transaction;

(d) supply or acquisition of goods including capital goods and
services in connection with commencement or closure of
business;

(e) provision by a club, association, society, or any such body
(for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or
benefits to its members;

(f) admission, for a consideration, of persons to any premises;

(g) services supplied by a person as the holder of an office
which has been accepted by him in the course or furtherance of
his trade, profession or vocation;

5[(h) activities of a race club including by way of totalisator or a
license to book maker or activities of a licensed book maker in
such club; and]

(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central
Government, a State Government or any local authority in
which they are engaged as public authorities;

Section 7. Scope of supply.

(1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression “supply”
includes—

(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such
as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, Licence, rental, lease
or disposal made or agreed to be made for a
consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of
business;

12

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

[(aa) the activities or transactions, by a person, other
than an individual, to its members or constituents or
vice-versa, for cash, deferred payment or other valuable
consideration.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, it is hereby
clarified that, notwithstanding anything contained in any other
law for the time being in force or any judgment, decree or order
of any Court, tribunal or authority, the person and its members
or constituents shall be deemed to be two separate persons
and the supply of activities or transactions inter se shall be
deemed to take place from one such person to another;]

(b) import of services for a consideration whether or not in the
course or furtherance of business;

(c) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be
made without a consideration;

[(1A) Where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply
in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall
be treated either as supply of goods or supply of services as
referred to in Schedule II.]

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-
section (1),—

(a) activities or transactions specified in Schedule III; or

(b) such activities or transactions undertaken by the
Central Government, a State Government or any local
authority in which they are engaged as public authorities,
as may be notified by the Government on the
recommendations of the Council, shall be treated neither
as a supply of goods nor a supply of services.

(3) Subject to the provisions of [sub-sections (1),
(1A) and (2)], the Government may, on the recommendations of
13

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to
be treated as—

(a) a supply of goods and not as a supply of services; or

(b) a supply of services and not as a supply of goods.

Section 9. Levy and collection.

(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), there
shall be levied a tax called the central goods and
services tax on all intra-State supplies of goods or
services or both, except on the supply of alcoholic
liquor for human consumption and un-denatured
extra neutral alcohol or rectified spirit used for
manufacture of alcoholic liquor, for human
consumption, on the value determined under section
15
and at such rates, not exceeding twenty per
cent., as may be notified by the Government on the
recommendations of the Council and collected in
such manner as may be prescribed and shall be
paid by the taxable person.

12. Sl.Nos.4 and 5, of Notification 12 of 2017 and Serial No. 66 of

Notification No.1 of 2017 are extracted below:

4 Chapter 99 Services by governmental authority Nil Nil
by way of any activity in relation to
any function entrusted to a
municipality under article 243 W of
the Constitution.

14

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

5. Chapter 99 Services by a “Governmental Nil Nil
Authority] by way of any activity in
relation to any function entrusted to a
Panchayat under article 243G of the
Constitution

(Heading Services provided-

9992 or
66 Heading

(a) by an educational institution to its
9963) students, faculty and staff;

(aa) by an educational
institution by way of conduct of
entrance examination against
consideration in the form of entrance
fee.

(b) to an educational institution, by
way of-

(i) transportation of students, faculty
and staff;

(ii) catering, including any mid-day
meals scheme sponsored by the
Central Government, State
Government or Union territory,

(iii) security or cleaning or
housekeeping services performed in
such educational institution;

(iv) services relating to admission to,
or conduct of examination by, such
institution:

(v) Supply of online educational
journals or periodicals:]
15

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

13. Section 9(1) provides for levy of tax on all intra-state supplies of

goods and services barring certain categories. The term “supply of services”

has not been defined in the definitions clause contained in Section 2 of the

GST Act. However, the scope of supply, has been explained in Section 7 of

the GST Act. This provision, which is an inclusive provision, brings within its

ambit, any supply of services, in any form, if it is in the course of or in

furtherance of business. While Section 7(1) describes supply of services in the

above manner, Section 7(2) (a) states that any activity or transaction

contained in schedule-III to the GST Act, would not be treated as a supply of

services, even if it falls within the ambit of Section 7(1) of the GST Act.

Similarly, Section 7(2)(b) takes out supply of services, undertaken by a

Central Government, State Government or local authority, from the ambit of

Section 7, if such activities or transactions are notified by the government on

the recommendation of the Council.

14. A reading of these provision, reveals that the legislature was

envisaging two categories of supplies. Firstly, supplies made by Non State

authorities and secondly, by State authorities. Section 7(1), which deals with

the first category, covers supply of services, in the course of or in the

furtherance of business. This would mean that any supply of service which is

not in the course of business, would not be a taxable supply of service.

Though, Section 7 (1) is couched as an inclusive definition, the above

interpretation appears to be the appropriate interpretation, in the absence of
16

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

any further guidance, in this provision. However, the legislature while

considering supply of services by the Central Government or State

Government or by any local authority appears to have removed the question

of whether supply is made in the course of business or not. It appears that the

Central, State and Local Governments have been put under a separate

category where questions of whether supply of services is in pursuance of

business or not, is irrelevant and all supplies of services, irrespective of

whether it is in the course of business or not, are taxable, unless they are

protected by including them in Schedule-III or by way of a specific notification.

15. This view is further fortified by Section 2(17)(i) which has brought

in all activities of the Central Government, State Government or Local

Authority into the ambit of business whether the conditions set out in Section

2(17)(a) to (h) are attracted or not. The legislature by including Section 7(2),

though in a negative form, appears to reiterate that all activities of the Central

Government, State Government, or Local Authorities would be taxable

whether they are in the course of or in furtherance of business, or not.

16. This brings up the question of whether the petitioner universities

would be the Central Government, a State Government or a Local Authority.

This issue comes up because the supply of the service, of grant of affiliations

or issuance of No Objection Certificate, by the petitioner university would be

taxable, without going into the question of whether such activity is in the
17

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

course of or in furtherance of business or not, if the university answers the

description of the Central Government, State Government or Local Authority.

17. The petitioner universities are all universities which are separate

entities, created and established under the Acts of the State Legislature and

they are not part of the State Government or Local Authority. They are not

part of the Central Government either. In such circumstances, the provisions

of Section 7(2) or Section 2(17)(i) would not be applicable to the petitioner

universities.

18. The term „business‟, as defined in Section 2(17), clearly does not

include statutory functions, which are cast upon the petitioner universities. The

activities mentioned in Section 2(17) are voluntary actions. However, the

petitioner universities are duty bound and are mandated to consider and grant

or refuse to grant affiliation or No Objection Certificates. In such a situation,

the activity of the petitioner universities in granting affiliations is a statutory

function and is not a business activity. Consequently, the activities of the

petitioner universities do not constitute supply of service as provided in

Section 7 of the GST Act. Consequently, these services would not be exigible

to tax.

19. This view, of this Court, is fortified by the aforesaid judgments

cited by Sri C. Raghavan Ramabhadran. This Court does not propose to
18

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

extract any of the aforesaid judgments. However, this Court would only record

that it is in respectful agreement with the aforesaid judgments.

20. The second issue of whether these services are exempted under

the notifications mentioned above would remain. In view of the fact that this

Court has now held that the services, which are sought to be taxed, are not

taxable, the question of whether such services require the exemption granted

under the aforesaid notifications could not arise. Before parting with the case,

it would also be necessary to record that, in the judgment of the Hon‟ble High

Court of Telangana, cited by Smt. Shanthi Chandra, the issue raised before

the Hon‟ble High Court of Telangana was only on the question of whether the

entries in the notifications mentioned above, provide such exemption. The

issue of whether the said services were not taxable, in the first place, was not

raised. In such circumstances, the said judgment may not be relevant for the

purposes of determining whether the services are taxable or not.

21. In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are allowed setting

aside the orders, which have been impugned in these writ petitions, and set

out in the table extracted above. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

________________
T.C.D.SEKHAR, J

RJS
19

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

W.P.No.23535, 31934 of 2023, 7867 and 26414 of 2025 and W.P.9123 of
2026
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao)

27.04.2026

RJS
20

RRR,J & TCDS,J
W.P.No.23535 of 2023 and batch



Source link