Jaithu Lohra @ Jethu Lohra vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opposite … on 21 May, 2026

    0
    23
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Jaithu Lohra @ Jethu Lohra vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opposite … on 21 May, 2026

                                                                2026:JHHC:15317
    
    
    
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                          B.A. No. 4375 of 2026
       Jaithu Lohra @ Jethu Lohra, aged about 50 years, S/o. Sanichar
       Lohra, R/o. Vill.- Marda Tundtoli, P.O. & P.S.- Palkot, Dist.-
       Gumla, Jharkhand.                              ...       Petitioner
                                   Versus
      The State of Jharkhand                   ...       Opposite Party
                                    -----
    

    Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
    For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.
    For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee , Spl.P.P.

    Order No.02/Dated- 21.05.2026

    SPONSORED

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Special

    P.P.

    2. The petitioner has been made an accused in connection with

    Complaint Case No. 04/2026, registered for offences punishable

    under Sections 9, 17(G), 27, 29, 39 (1B), 44, 48B, 49B of the Wild

    Life (Protection) Act, 1972, which is pending in the Court of learned

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla.

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is

    innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been

    falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is no

    independent witness with respect to recovery of the incriminating

    articles. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since

    23.12.2025. It is also submitted that similarly situated co-accused

    persons, namely, Bahuran Singh, Ravindra Singh, Jaidev Singh and

    Shivshankar Singh have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate

    Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 1912 of 2026 vide order dated

    13.03.2026. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation

    1|Page
    2026:JHHC:15317
    of the case and abides by all terms and conditions which may be

    imposed. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail.

    4. Learned Special P. P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the

    petitioner.

    5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

    case, I find substance in the contentions raised on behalf of

    petitioner. Therefore, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

    Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released

    on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty

    thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

    satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla in

    connection with Complaint Case No. 04/2026 with condition that

    petitioner shall appear physically on each and every date during the

    trial of case till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is

    dispensed with for sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned

    trial court and with further condition that petitioner shall not indulge

    in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the

    witnesses or gain over them.

    (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

    21.05.2026
    Rahul/Arpit
    Uploaded on 21/05/2026

    2|Page



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here