Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Jahid S/O Khurshid vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 July, 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8999/2026
URN: CRLMB / 16504U / 2026
1. Jahid S/o Khurshid, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bilang,
Police Station Kaman District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Is
Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
2. Mukim @ Vakim S/o Paltu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Bilang, Police Station Kaman District Deeg (Raj.) (At
Present Is Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9473/2026
URN: CRLMB / 17516U / 2026
Farukh S/o Saudan, Aged About 99 Years, R/o Vilang, Ps Kaman,
District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail
Deeg)
—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan
Mr. Amit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
09/07/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483
BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 30.05.2026 passed by
learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Kama, District-
Deeg, in Bail Application No.786/2026, whereby the bail
application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R.
No.339/2017, Police Station-Kama, District-Deeg for the offences
under Sections 364A, 365, 420, 341, 395, 120B IPC.
(Uploaded on 15/07/2026 at 10:46:56 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 01:35:51 AM)
(2 of 4) [CRLMB-8999/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
allegation against the petitioners is limited to snatching an amount
of Rs.2,000/- and nothing more. He further submits that the co-
accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court. He also submits that one of the co-accused,
namely, Azruddin, has been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.01.2018.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the
case of the petitioners is on no lessor footing than that of the co-
accused, namely, Azruddin, as the allegations against all the four
accused-petitioners are identical in the FIR. Learned counsel fairly
submits that one criminal cases of the year 2010 under Section
376 IPC is pending against Jahid and no case against Mumkin and
one case against Faruk is pending.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that,
except for the aforesaid cases, no other criminal case involving
offences of a similar nature or any other offence is pending
against the accused-petitioners. Learned counsel further submits
that two accused persons, namely, Nasim S/o Ummar and Anish
S/o Jamil, have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated
13.10.2017 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, and
accused Azruddin has also been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide
order dated 02.01.2018.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan
in the present case has already been filed. He further submits that
the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time.
Therefore, he prays that the petitioners, who are in custody since
08.05.2026, may be enlarged on bail.
(Uploaded on 15/07/2026 at 10:46:56 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 01:35:51 AM)
(3 of 4) [CRLMB-8999/2026]
6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail
application.
7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
8. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and
considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the
parties, that the charge-sheet has already been filed; conclusion
of trial will take sufficiently long time and further the fact that the
two accused persons, namely, Nasim S/o Ummar and Anish S/o
Jamil, have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated
13.10.2017 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, and
accused Azruddin has also been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide
order dated 02.01.2018; therefore, this Court deems it
appropriate that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
9. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered
that the accused-petitioners – (i) Jahid S/o Khurshid, (ii)
Mukim @ Vakim S/o Paltu and (iii) Farukh S/o Saudan
arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.339/2017, Police Station
Kama, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of
them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh
Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only)
each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the
stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and
as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial
and with additional following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the
permission of the Court;
(Uploaded on 15/07/2026 at 10:46:56 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 01:35:51 AM)
(4 of 4) [CRLMB-8999/2026]
(ii) The petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to
the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the
commission of which he is suspected; and
(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make
any inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any
police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J
39-40/JUBIN
(Uploaded on 15/07/2026 at 10:46:56 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/07/2026 at 01:35:51 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
