Important judgments on POCSO Act

    0
    20
    ADVERTISEMENT

     POCSO Act Imp. Judgments

    1. Arjun Malge Vs. State of Maharashtra Bom HC 2021

    SPONSORED

    Held : Notice of hearing of case and bail application is mandatory to victim. 

    2.Aparna Bhat vs. State of M P. Supreme Court 2021

    Held: Notice to victim must. Bail conditions should not be arbitrary. 

    3.Nipun Saxena vs. Union of India Supreme Court 2019

    Identity of victim should be concealed. Guidelines given. 

    4.Sangita Tanpure Vs. state of Maharashtra 2020 Bom HC

    Identity of victim to be concealed. Not to mention name in charge, deposition. More elaborate guidelines laid down. 

    5.State of Karnataka Vs. Shivanna 2014 Supreme Court

    Copy of statement under section 164 Cr. P. C. of victim not to be given to accused until filing of chargesheet. 

    6. Atul Ambale vs. Maharashtra 2022 Bom HC

    Held.- Evidence of victim to be recorded within 30 days from chargesheet. 

    (Directions to POCSO Courts) 

    7. XYZ  vs. state of MP 2022 Supreme Court

    Incamera proceedings, Screen, how to conduct cross of victim. 

    Guidelines issued. 

    8. Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana 2013 Supreme Court

    Mahadeo Mhaske vs Maharashtra 2013 Supreme Court

    How to determine age of victim

    9. Vardrajan vs. State of MP 1965 Supreme Court

    Age of understanding of victim (363 IPC cases) 

    10. Amol Barsagade vs. Maharashtra 2018 Bom HC

    Presumptions under pocso Act. 

    Print Page



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here