Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Himachal on 7 May, 2026

    0
    22
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Introductory:

    SPONSORED

    The respondent No.3 before the Court of the III Additional District

    Judge-cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kakinada (for short “the learned

    MACT”), in M.V.O.P.No.523 of 2004 filed the present appeal, questioning the

    liability imposed and quantum of compensation awarded under the decree

    and order dated 30.03.2007.

    2. The 1st respondent herein is the claimant/petitioner, (being minor

    represented by his father and next friend) before the learned MACT. The 2nd

    respondent is the driver of the Tipper lorry bearing No. AP 16 V 3043

    [hereinafter referred as „the offending vehicle‟] and the 3rd respondent herein is

    the owner of the offending vehicle.

    3. For the sake of convenience, parties will be herein after referred as the

    claimant/petitioner and the respondents as and how they are arrayed before

    the learned MACT.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here