Hussain Nabiullah Shah vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 May, 2026

    0
    6
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Bombay High Court

    Hussain Nabiullah Shah vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 May, 2026

    2026:BHC-AS:22720
    
               Manoj                                                                 6-BA-4815-2025.doc
    
    
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    
                           CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4815 OF 2025
    
               Alkasim @ Nawab Sajid Siddiqui                      .... Applicant
                     Vs.
               State of Maharashtra                                .... Respondent
    
                                            WITH
                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2026
                                              IN
                           CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4815 OF 2025
    
               Mr. Hussain Nabiullah Shah                          .... Intervener
               IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :-
               Alkasim @ Nawab Sajid Siddiqui                      .... Applicant
                     Vs.
               State of Maharashtra                                .... Respondent
    
               Adv. Aditya Parmar a/w Adv. Abdul Wahab Shaikh, for the Applicant.
               Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
    
                                        CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
    

    DATED : 25th MAY, 2026
    (VACATION COURT)

    P.C. :-

    SPONSORED

    . Present Application seeking release of the Applicant on bail in

    connection with C.R. No.1709 of 2025 registered with Mumbra Police

    Station under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya

    Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

    2) First informant Husain Nabiulah Shah has filed the aforesaid

    Interim Application No.280 of 2026 to intervene in this Bail Application.

    However, none appeared for the first informant.

    1/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 26/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 26/05/2026 20:42:58 :::

     Manoj                                                                6-BA-4815-2025.doc
    
    
    3)              Hence, heard Mr. Parmar, learned Counsel for the Applicant &
    
    

    Mr.Agarkar, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

    4) The prosecution case is that, on 26.10.2025 at about 17:00

    hours while the first informant/victim was cleaning his vehicle, the

    Applicant and his co-accused namely Chhotu @ Salim and Amir came there.

    Co-accused Chhotu @ Salim and Amir caught hold of the hands of the

    informant from his behind and the Applicant assaulted the informant over

    his neck by means of a knife and caused him serious injury. On the report

    filed by the informant, the aforesaid crime came to be registered. During

    the course of investigation, the Applicant and his co-accused were arrested.

    The Applicant’s Application seeking bail was rejected by the Sessions Court.

    Hence, this Application.

    5) Mr. Parmar, learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that,

    the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. Except one criminal

    case, the Applicant has no other antecedent. The Applicant is permanent

    resident of the given address and he is not likely to abscond. Applicant had

    preferred the Bail Application before the Sessions Court after filing of the

    charge-sheet. However, the bail was refused. Therefore, the Applicant may

    be released on bail.

    6) The learned APP opposed the Application on the premise that

    serious offence is committed by the Applicant. The antecedent of the

    Applicant indicates that he is not a law abiding person. Therefore, bail may

    be refused.

    2/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 26/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 26/05/2026 20:42:58 :::

     Manoj                                                                   6-BA-4815-2025.doc
    
    
    7)              I have considered rival submissions. It is the matter of record
    
    

    that since the charge-sheet is filed, the detention of the Applicant is not

    required for further investigation. The injury certificate mentions that the

    injuries suffered by the informant are simple. There is no possibility of the

    present crime escalating to a higher offence. The Applicant is permanent

    resident of the given address and he is not likely to abscond. No doubt,

    previously, one crime was registered against the Applicant for the offence

    under Section 324 of the I.P.C. but, Mr parmar submits that, in that case the

    Applicant is on bail. There is no apprehension that the Applicant is likely to

    tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner and abscond. The trial

    will take it’s own time. The co-accused have been granted bail by the trial

    Court, who have been roped in the crime by virtue of sharing the common

    intention.

    8) In view thereof, the Applicant deserves to be released on bail

    but subject to certain conditions. Hence, following Order :-

    (a) The Applicant Alkasim @ Nawab Sajid Siddiqui shall be
    released on bail in connection with C.R. No.1709 of 2025
    registered with Mumbra Police Station under Sections 109,
    115(2), 352, 351(3) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
    on his executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one
    or two sureties in the like amount.

    (b) The Applicant shall report to Mumbra Police Station, on
    1st and 16th day of each calendar month between 10:00 a.m. to
    02:00 p.m. until further Orders.

    3/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 26/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 26/05/2026 20:42:58 :::

     Manoj                                                                     6-BA-4815-2025.doc
    
    
                    (c)      The Applicant shall attend before the trial Court on each
    

    and every date, unless exempted by the trial Court, for reasons
    to be recorded in writing.

    (d) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution
    evidence and shall not directly or indirectly influence the
    prosecution witnesses to prevent them from deposing against
    him.

    (e) Before his release from jail, the Applicant shall provide
    his contact number and the detailed residential address where
    he would stay and contact number of one of his close relative
    who can be contacted if required by the police, till the trial in
    the case is over.

    (f) The Applicant shall not commit any offence.

    (g) If the Applicant disobeys any of the above conditions, the
    bail granted herein shall stand cancelled without further
    reference to this Court or the trial Court.

    9)              The Bail Application is disposed of.
    
    10)             Since the informant - Mr. Hussain Nabiullah Shah is absent,
    
    

    Interim Application No.280 of 2026 stands disposed of.

    (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

    4/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 26/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 26/05/2026 20:42:58 :::



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here