Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Himmat Singh Son Of Shri Sardar Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:25655]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6461/2024
URN: CRLMP / 13096U / 2024
Himmat Singh Son Of Shri Sardar Singh, Aged About 21 Years,
Resident Of Rundiya Nagar, New Mandir Ke Piche, Bharatpur
(Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Satyaveer Singh Son Of Rambharosi, Resident Of Teen
Thok Jagheena, Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur (Raj).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
08/07/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer
has been made to quash the entire proceedings arising out of FIR
No.821/2022 registered at the Police Station Mathuragate, District
Bharatpur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned
FIR has been registered against the petitioner for the offences
punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120B IPC and
under Sections 3/25(6) and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel
submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence
whatsoever, but he has been falsely implicated in the instant case
by the complainant by concocting a false story, hence, a prayer
has been made to quash the entire proceedings arising out of the
impugned FIR.
(Uploaded on 13/07/2026 at 02:49:31 PM)
(Downloaded on 14/07/2026 at 11:39:41 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:25655] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6461/2024]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer
made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and
perused the material available on record.
5. Perusal of the allegations levelled in the impugned FIR
reveals commission of cognizable offence and the correctness of
the allegations cannot be examined by this Court while exercising
inherent powers contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court
cannot conduct fishing and roving enquiry to find out the truth
behind the allegations levelled against the petitioner. Certainly,
this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer.
6. Considering the over all facts and circumstances of the case,
this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant
petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate
representation. It is expected from the Investigating Officer to
consider the same and submit the conclusion report of
investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the Competent
Court strictly in accordance with law.
7. This order has its effect only if the investigation is still lying
pending and in case, charge-sheet has already been submitted
against the petitioner then he would be at liberty to take all these
grounds and the defence before the Trial Court at the appropriate
stage of trial.
8. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands
disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if
any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
17/Karan
(Uploaded on 13/07/2026 at 02:49:31 PM)
(Downloaded on 14/07/2026 at 11:39:41 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
