Haokhotinlen Vaiphei S/O Late … vs State Of Manipur on 20 May, 2026

    0
    20
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Manipur High Court

    Haokhotinlen Vaiphei S/O Late … vs State Of Manipur on 20 May, 2026

    Author: Ahanthem Bimol Singh

    Bench: Ahanthem Bimol Singh

    KABOR Digitally
           by
                    signed
    
    
    AMBAM KABORAMBAM
           SAPANA
    
    SAPANA CHANU
           Date:
    CHANU 2026.05.20
           17:06:31 +05'30'
    
                                                                                              Item No. 9
                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                                         AT IMPHAL
                                                        WP (C) No. 1099 of 2022
    
                                            Haokhotinlen Vaiphei S/o Late Thongkholal Vaiphei, aged
                                            about 65 years, Ex-Officio Chairman, S. Molnom Village,
                                            Champhai Block, Kangpokpi District Manipur-795107.
                                                                                   .......Petitioner
                                                                Vs.
                                         1. State of Manipur
                                            Rep. by its Secretary/Commissioner (Revenue),
                                            Secretariat Building, Babupara, PO & PS Imphal, Imphal
                                            West District, Manipur-795001.
                                         2. The Deputy Commissioner, Kangpokpi, Kangpokpi District,
                                            P.O &P.S Kangpokpi, Manipur-795129.
                                         3. National     Highways       Infrastructure   Development
                                            Corporation Limited,
                                            (NHIDCL),
                                            Rep. by its General Manager, Regional Office, Manipur at
                                            Transit Hostel, Officer's Club, Lamphelpat, Imphal West,
                                            Manipur -795004.
                                                                              .......... Respondents
    
                                                     BEFORE
                                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
    
                                        For the Petitioner              :    Stephen P, Advocate
                                        For the respondents No. 1 & 2   :    Shyam Sharma, GA
                                        For the respondent No. 3        :    S. Kaminikumar, CGC
                                                                             Amrjit, Advocate
                                        Date of Hearing                 :    20.05.2026
                                        Date of Order                   :    20.05.2026
    
                                                             ORDER (ORAL)

    [1] Heard Mr. Stephen P., learned counsel appearing for

    the petitioner, Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appearing for the

    SPONSORED

    respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mr. Amarjit, learned counsel representing

    WP (C) No. 1099 of 2022 Page 1
    Mr. S. Kaminikumar, learned CGC appearing on behalf of respondent

    No. 3.

    [2] The present writ petition pertains to claim of

    compensation by the writ petitioner for the land acquired by the

    Government. According to the petitioner even though his land has

    been acquired, no compensation has been given by the authority for

    acquisition of his land. The learned counsel also submitted that

    during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner has

    approached the Deputy Commissioner/CALA, Kangpokpi District,

    Manipur (respondent No. 2) by submitting a representation dated

    Nil.04.2026 which was received by the office of the Deputy

    Commissioner/CALA, Kangpokpi District on 02.05.2026 and that the

    said representation is still pending for consideration and disposal by

    the respondent No. 2.

    [3] It has been submitted by the learned counsel

    appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner will be satisfied if the

    present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.

    2 to consider the said representation submitted by the petitioner on

    its own merit and strictly in terms of the applicable Acts and Rules

    and to dispose of the same by issuing a speaking order within a

    stipulated period.

     WP (C) No. 1099 of 2022                                           Page 2
     [4]           Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA and Mr. Amarjit,
    
    

    learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that

    as the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is confined to the

    consideration and disposal of the representation submitted by him,

    they have no objection in disposing of this writ petition as prayed

    for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

    [5] Considering the submission advanced by the learned

    counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the records, this

    Court is satisfied that the interest of justice will be served by issuing

    the following directions:-

    (1) The respondent No. 2, viz., the Deputy

    Commissioner/CALA, Kangpokpi District,

    Manipur is hereby directed to consider the

    representation submitted by the petitioner on its

    own merit and strictly in terms of the provisions

    of section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act,

    1956 and to pass appropriate orders.

    (2) The whole process should be completed within a

    period of 3 months from the date of receive of a

    certified copy of this order.

     WP (C) No. 1099 of 2022                                           Page 3
                   (3)    The respondent No. 2 is further directed to
    
    

    communicate to the petitioner as well as to the

    respondent No. 3 about any decision taken by

    him in connection with the said representation

    within a period of 3 weeks from the date of

    taking such a decision.

    [6] With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition

    is disposed of.

    
    
    
    
                                                       JUDGE
    
     Sapana
    
    
    
    
     WP (C) No. 1099 of 2022                                        Page 4
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here