Elder Neutracitcals Private Limited vs Elder Prroject Limited on 9 March, 2026

    0
    43
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1) This is an action by the Plaintiff complaining of
    infringement and passing off in respect of its registered trademark

    used by it for manufacture and sale of its pharmaceutical and
    medicinal products. It is Plaintiff’s case that the Defendant’s mark

    SPONSORED

    is identical with and/or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s mark
    and that the Defendant is using the impugned mark in respect of
    identical goods. In its Suit, Plaintiff filed application for temporary
    injunction. On 26 September 2025, the Plaintiff persuaded this Court to
    pass an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in its favour inter alia restraining

    the Defendant from using the mark or any other deceptively
    similar mark containing the word ELDER. This Court also appointed
    Court Receiver for sezuire of goods of the Defendant. Upon being
    served with ex-parte ad-interim injunction order, the Defendant has
    filed Interim Application (L) No.35091 of 2025 seeking vacation of the
    ex-parte ad-interim injunction order dated 26 September 2025 under
    Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code).
    With the consent of parties, Defendant’s application for vacation of ad-
    interim injunction and Plaintiff’s application for temporary injunction
    are taken up for hearing together.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here