― Advertisement ―

HomeDr. Narinder Dhruv Batra vs Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin ......

Dr. Narinder Dhruv Batra vs Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin … on 18 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Dr. Narinder Dhruv Batra vs Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin … on 18 April, 2026

Author: Rahul Bharti

Bench: Rahul Bharti

                                              Serial No. 252
                                           Supplementary List-1

 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                 AT JAMMU

CM(M) No. 66/2026
CM No. 2288/2026

Cav. No. 999/2026

Dr. Narinder Dhruv Batra
                                                       .....Petitioner

                  Through: Mr. Manik Bhardwaj, Advocate

             Vs

Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin Society & Ors.

                                                    .....Respondents

                  Through: Mr. Rohit Verma, Advocate for the
                           Caveator

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
                         ORDER

(18.04.2026)

Cav. No. 999/2026

SPONSORED

01. With the appearance of learned counsel for the caveator,

caveat stands discharged.

CM(M) No. 66/2026

02. Heard Mr. Manik Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the

petitioner.

03. The petitioner is aggrieved of an adjudication made by the

court of learned Additional District Judge, Jammu in terms

of an order dated 02.04.2026 in a civil suit preferred by

the petitioner whereby the court of learned Additional
2

CM(M) No. 66/2026
CM No. 2288/2026

District Judge, Jammu has taken on record the written

statement submitted on behalf of the defendants No. 1 to 6

overruling the objections of the petitioner that the filing of

the written statement/s on behalf of the defendants No. 1

to 6 individual-wise was taking place beyond prescribed

period of 120 days as mandated under Order 8 Rule 1 of

the J&K Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

04. The petitioner is, thus, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction

of this Court under article 227 of the Constitution of India

for examining the legality and validity of the order.

05. There are some legal aspects which require indulgence of

this Court for the sake of serving the clarity to the civil

courts below as this Court is consistently coming across

with matters of similar nature whereby due service of

summons in a civil suit is not taking place for the purpose

of setting the timeline of filing of the written statement into

action and further in a civil suit against a society and its

office bearers, the filing of written statement by and on

behalf of the society is to be done in which manner and by

whose authority and signature.

06. Issue notice to the respondents in the main petition and in

the CM No. 2288/2026 as well.

07. The respondents No. 1 and 7 are on caveat through Mr.

Rohit Verma, learned Advocate, who waives notice on their
3

CM(M) No. 66/2026
CM No. 2288/2026

behalf. He accepts notice on behalf of other respondents

also and seeks time to file Vakalatnama on their behalf.

08. Reply/Objections to the application CM No. 2288/2026 be

filed from the end of the non-applicants/respondents by or

before next date of hearing.

09. Send for the scanned record of the civil suit titled “Dr.

Narinder Dhruv Batra Vs. Shri Chander Chinar Akhara

Udasin Society Bada & Ors.,” from the court of learned

Additional District Judge, Jammu for perusal of this Court.

10. The Registrar Judicial, Jammu to requisition the record

positively by next date of hearing.

11. List this case in continuation on 27.04.2026 with a liberty

to make a mention.

12. In the meantime and till next date of hearing, the court

below is requested not to take any effective proceedings on

the file of the civil suit on the posted date of hearing which

is falling on 20.04.2026.

(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
JAMMU
18.04.2026
SUNIL



Source link