Directotate Of Education vs Gokul Through Lrs on 25 July, 2026

    0
    7
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Delhi High Court – Orders

    Directotate Of Education vs Gokul Through Lrs on 25 July, 2026

    Author: Sanjeev Narula

    Bench: Sanjeev Narula

                              $~2
                              *         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +         W.P.(C) 6523/2014
                                        DIRECTOTATE OF EDUCATION                                                               .....Petitioner
                                                                      Through:            Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for
                                                                                          GNCTD.
                                                                      versus
    
                                        GOKUL THROUGH LRS.                                                     .....Respondents
                                                    Through:                              Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate for
                                                                                          Applicants.
                                                                                          Mr. Malik, Advocate.
    
                                        CORAM:
                                        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
                                                   ORDER
    

    % 25.07.2026
    CM APPL. 40030/2026 (for seeking impleadment)

    1. The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

    SPONSORED

    2. Issue notice. Ms. Urvi Mohan, counsel appearing for the Petitioner,
    accepts notice. She seeks and is granted six weeks’ time to file a reply with
    an advance copy to counsel for the Applicant. Rejoinder if any, be filed
    before the next date of hearing

    3. List on 8th October, 2026
    W.P.(C) 6523/2014

    4. Mr. Malik, counsel appearing for the legal representatives of Gukul,
    submits that certain subsequent developments have taken place concerning
    the transfer of the property in question. He seeks leave to place the same on
    record by way of an appropriate application.

    5. Ms. Urvi Mohan, counsel appearing for the Petitioner, points out that,

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 20:31:04
    by order dated 24th September, 2014, this Court had stayed the operation of
    the impugned order dated 27th November, 2013. She accordingly contends
    that any transfer effected thereafter would not confer any enforceable right
    upon a subsequent purchaser.

    6. The aforesaid contentions are left open. The legal effect of any
    transfer stated to have been effected during the pendency of the present
    proceedings shall be examined at the stage of final hearing, upon the
    relevant material being placed on record.

    7. Counsel for the parties shall file brief written submissions, not
    exceeding three pages, together with copies of the judgments relied upon, at
    least one week before the next date of hearing. Advance copies shall be
    exchanged between counsel.

    8. List on 8th October, 2026.

    SANJEEV NARULA, J
    JULY 25, 2026
    nk

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 20:31:04



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here