Dipen Chawda vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 March, 2026

    0
    52
    ADVERTISEMENT

    2. The genesis of the FIR lies in a disclosure made by the Enforcement

    Directorate vide letter dated 11.07.2023 under Section 66 of the Prevention

    SPONSORED

    of Money Laundering Act in ECIR No. 11/2022, upon which the State

    agency initiated the present criminal proceedings. The applicant was

    initially not an accused in the early stages of investigation. Subsequently,

    the applicant came to be named only in the 6th supplementary charge-

    sheet filed on 24.11.2025, wherein the prosecution has arrayed as many

    as 117 accused persons and cited more than 1110 witnesses, relying upon

    over 990documents.

    3. The prosecution case against the present applicant rests primarily

    on selectively extracted WhatsApp chats allegedly exchanged between

    certain co-accused persons, namely Anwar Dewar, Anil Tuteja,

    Soumya Chaurasiya and Vikash Agrawal. Significantly, there is no direct

    communication alleged between the present applicant and the said co-

    accused persons, and the only assertion made is that the applicant was

    acquainted with co-accused Anwar Dewar. It is further alleged that

    certain code words appearing in the chats, such as the letters “S.C.”

    allegedly referring to Soumya Chaurasiya and the expression “files”

    allegedly representing monetary transactions, have been interpreted by the

    investigating agency as indicating illegal gratification. However, no

    independent material has been placed on record to establish the

    authenticity, meaning, or context of such alleged code words, and the

    entire inference is based solely on the interpretation of the investigating

    agency.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here