― Advertisement ―

HomeDevilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:19498) on 24 April, 2026

Devilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:19498) on 24 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Devilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:19498) on 24 April, 2026

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2026:RJ-JD:19498]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
        S.B. Suspension Of Sentence(Revision) No. 121/2026

1.       Devilal S/o Shobhalal, Aged About 34 Years, Sinchai
         Nagar, Keer Kheda, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At
         Present Lodged In Chittorgarh Jail)
2.       Bhairulal S/o Shobhalal, Aged About 27 Years, Sinchai
         Nagar, Keer Kheda, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At
         Present Lodged In Chittorgarh Jail)
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Shree Kant Verma
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shri Ram Choudhary, PP



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

24/04/2026

SPONSORED

1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

moved on behalf of the applicants in the matter of judgment dated

24.03.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District

Chittorgarh in Criminal Appeal No.96/2023 whereby they were

convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum 2 years’ simple

imprisonment under Section 452 of the IPC and lesser punishment

for the other offences under Sections 323/34 of the IPC

2. It is contended on behalf of the applicants that the learned

trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual

aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous

conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be

appreciated again by this court; hearing of the revision is likely to

(Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:06:30 AM)
(Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 09:37:44 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:19498] (2 of 3) [SOSR-121/2026]

take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of

sentence may be granted.

3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for

releasing the petitioner on application for suspension of sentence.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

parties and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, more particularly the facts that the accused-petitioner

was on bail during the course of trial and the hearing of revision is

likely to take further more time and considering the overall

submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the

niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the

same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the revision, this

court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the

sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by learned Session Judge who passed the

impugned order 24.03.2026 in Criminal Appeal No.96/2023

against the petitioner-applicants (i) Devilal S/o Shobhalal and (ii)

Bhairulal S/o Shobhalal shall remain suspended till final disposal of

the aforesaid revision and they shall be released on bail provided

each of them execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

(Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:06:30 AM)
(Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 09:37:44 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:19498] (3 of 3) [SOSR-121/2026]

learned trial Judge and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal

of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

(1) That they will appear before the trial Court in the
month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

(2) That if the applicants change the place of residence,
they will give in writing their changed addresses to the
trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they
will give in writing their changed address to the trial
Court.

7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicants do not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J
45-Arjun/-

(Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:06:30 AM)
(Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 09:37:44 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link