Devilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:19498) on 24 April, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

    Devilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:19498) on 24 April, 2026

    Author: Farjand Ali

    Bench: Farjand Ali

    [2026:RJ-JD:19498]
    
          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                           JODHPUR
            S.B. Suspension Of Sentence(Revision) No. 121/2026
    
    1.       Devilal S/o Shobhalal, Aged About 34 Years, Sinchai
             Nagar, Keer Kheda, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At
             Present Lodged In Chittorgarh Jail)
    2.       Bhairulal S/o Shobhalal, Aged About 27 Years, Sinchai
             Nagar, Keer Kheda, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At
             Present Lodged In Chittorgarh Jail)
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
    State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                     ----Respondent
    
    
    For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Shree Kant Verma
    For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shri Ram Choudhary, PP
    
    
    
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

    Order

    24/04/2026

    SPONSORED

    1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

    moved on behalf of the applicants in the matter of judgment dated

    24.03.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District

    Chittorgarh in Criminal Appeal No.96/2023 whereby they were

    convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum 2 years’ simple

    imprisonment under Section 452 of the IPC and lesser punishment

    for the other offences under Sections 323/34 of the IPC

    2. It is contended on behalf of the applicants that the learned

    trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual

    aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous

    conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be

    appreciated again by this court; hearing of the revision is likely to

    (Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:06:30 AM)
    (Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 09:37:44 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JD:19498] (2 of 3) [SOSR-121/2026]

    take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of

    sentence may be granted.

    3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently

    opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for

    releasing the petitioner on application for suspension of sentence.

    4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

    5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

    parties and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of

    the case, more particularly the facts that the accused-petitioner

    was on bail during the course of trial and the hearing of revision is

    likely to take further more time and considering the overall

    submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the

    niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the

    same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the revision, this

    court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the

    sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.

    6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

    under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

    sentence passed by learned Session Judge who passed the

    impugned order 24.03.2026 in Criminal Appeal No.96/2023

    against the petitioner-applicants (i) Devilal S/o Shobhalal and (ii)

    Bhairulal S/o Shobhalal shall remain suspended till final disposal of

    the aforesaid revision and they shall be released on bail provided

    each of them execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

    with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

    (Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:06:30 AM)
    (Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 09:37:44 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JD:19498] (3 of 3) [SOSR-121/2026]

    learned trial Judge and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal

    of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

    (1) That they will appear before the trial Court in the
    month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

    (2) That if the applicants change the place of residence,
    they will give in writing their changed addresses to the
    trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

    (3) Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they
    will give in writing their changed address to the trial
    Court.

    7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

    the accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as

    Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

    applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

    be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

    not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

    pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

    accused applicants do not appear before the trial court, the

    learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

    cancellation of bail.

    (FARJAND ALI),J
    45-Arjun/-

    (Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:06:30 AM)
    (Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 09:37:44 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here