Darogi Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 18 May, 2026

    0
    26
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Darogi Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 18 May, 2026

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20356 of 2026
                             Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2017 Thana- SONO District- Jamui
                     ======================================================
                     Darogi Yadav S/O Bodhan Yadav R/O Village- Dudhania, P.S- Sono, Distt.-
                     Jamui.
    
                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                            Versus
                     The State of Bihar Bihar
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :       Mrs. Ankita Kumari, Advocate
                     For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    3   18-05-2026

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

    APP for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

    Sono P.S. Case No. 158 of 2017, registered under Sections 147,

    148, 149, 120(B), 121(A) of Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4

    of Explosive Substance and Sections 16 / 17 /18/19/20/21/22 of

    the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967.

    3. As per prosecution case, informant receives

    information that some naxalties assembled in Nainy Pathar

    forest and on the basis of such information informant reached

    there along with police force. Two persons were caught and they

    disclosed the name of present petitioner.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

    petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20356 of 2026(3) dt.18-05-2026
    2/2

    present case. Petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2022.

    5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

    the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named in the

    FIR and also carries 42 criminal antecedents.

    6. Considering the criminal antecedents of the

    petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the

    petitioner, this bail application is dismissed.

    7. If the trial is not concluded within six months, the

    petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

    8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

    prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

    adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

    shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

    and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

    manner.

    
    
                                                                    (Ansul, J)
    
    Ranjeet/- Nitesh
    U       T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here