(Oral)
Heard learned counsel for the respective parties in all the
aforesaid three petitions.
2026:MLHC:163
2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent
of the parties and the aforesaid petition is taken up for final
disposal.
3. By the aforesaid petitions, the petitioner therein (same
petitioner in all the petitions) seeks quashing of the proceeding
as well as bailable warrants issued against her by the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, East Khasi Hills, Shillong
in CR Case No.1090 of 2016, CR Case No.1092 of 2016 and
CR Case No.1093 of 2016.
4. The grievance of the petitioner in the aforesaid petitions is
that though she is not connected with M/s Suntechno Mutual
Benefit India Limited and its Directors in any way, her name is
shown in the complaint filed by the Registrar of Companies
(ROC), Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram
and Arunachal Pradesh, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, as C/o of
M/s Suntechno Mutual Benefit India Limited. He states that
three complaints have been filed by the ROC are against the
company-M/s Suntechno Mutual Benefit India Limited and its
Directors, as they failed to file their annual returns and balance
2026:MLHC:163
sheet in terms of Sub-section 4 of Section 92 of the Companies
Act, 2013. He submits that bailable warrant has been issued to
the petitioner, in each of the three cases, only because, in the
ROC record, the name of the petitioner is shown as C/o in the
address of M/s Suntechno Mutual Benefit India Limited.
