Commissioner Of Customs Preventive … vs Shri Anil Kumar Soni on 31 March, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Mr. N.K. Chowdhury, Ld. Adv.

    Ms. Nilotpal Chowdhury, Ld. Adv.

    SPONSORED

    Mr. Prabir Bera, Ld. Adv.

    Mr. Deepak Sharma, Ld. Adv.

    Hearing concluded on : 13.02.2026

    Judgment on : 31.03.2026

    CUSTA 30 OF 2025 & CUSTA 31 OF 2025

    Uday Kumar, J:-

    1. INTRODUCTION

    1.1 These two appeals, preferred by the Commissioner of

    Customs (Preventive), Kolkata, under Section 130 of the

    Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter “the Act”), challenge a

    common Final Order of the CESTAT, Eastern Zonal Bench,

    dated November 22, 2024. The litigation originates from a

    singular investigative operation resulting in the interception of

    1,999.90 grams of gold bullion and its subsequent absolute

    confiscation by the Adjudicating Authority.

    1.2 CUSTA 30 of 2025 concerns Shri Anil Kumar Soni (Respondent

    No. 1), the proprietor of M/s A.R.P. Ornaments, who asserts

    lawful ownership of the seized metal. CUSTA 31 of 2025

    pertains to Shri Anil Kumar Gaur (Respondent No. 2), the

    carrier from whose physical possession the bullion was

    recovered. Since both appeals arise from an identical

    evidentiary bedrock and involve synchronous questions of law

    regarding the interpretation of Sections 108 and 123, they are

    hereby disposed of by this Common Judgment.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here