Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Chetan Patni S/O Subhash Patni vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:15036) on 10 April, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:15036]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 35/2026
Chetan Patni S/o Subhash Patni, R/o 402 The Palm Mahavir
Nagar Durgapura Jaipur.
---Complainant-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Non-Petitioner
2. Neha Bumb W/o Shri Mohit Kumar Bumb, R/o 104, S.B.C.
Apartment Lalarpura Road, Gandhi Path West Vaishali
Nagar, Jaipur At Present Residing At Flat No. 217 Silver
Crown Opposite S.B.C. Apartment Lalarpura Road Gandhi
Path West Vaishali Nagar Jaipur.
3. Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Tara Chand Jain, R/o 104, S.B.C.
Apartment Lalarpura Road, Gandhi Path West Vaishali
Nagar, Jaipur At Present Residing At Flat No. 217 Silver
Crown Opposite S.B.C. Apartment Lalarpura Road Gandhi
Path West Vaishali Nagar Jaipur.
----Accused-Non-petitioners
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sharvan Saini
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
with Mr. Ashok Sharma
Mr. M.S. Choudhary
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
10/04/2026
1. The instant bail cancellation application has been filed under
Section 483(3) of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 363/2024
registered at Police Station Bassi District Jaipur City (East) for the
offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC.
2. On 06.11.2025, the non-applicant(s) was given benefit of
grant of bail, taking note of the consensus drawn in-between the
(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 01:28:55 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/04/2026 at 08:59:15 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:15036] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-35/2026]
respective sides vis-a-vis the arrears, that was assured to be paid
within a period of successive three months.
3. It is submitted that present bail cancellation application is
moved as the non-applicants have disobeyed the orders of Court
and have breached the conditions, therefore, bail should be
canceled.
4. Learned counsel for the non-applicants has fairly conceded
the fact that the non-applicants have not paid the arrears,
because of undue hardship being faced by them. Learned counsel
for the non-applicants has pleaded for grant of extension of time,
however, learned counsel for the applicant has denied the same
stating that the bail grant order was passed, in consonance with
the consent as rendered thereby.
5. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel
for the parties, considering the fact that non-applicants have
disobeyed the orders of Court, failed to submit the arrears, and
have breached the conditions, and in light of the guidelines spelled
out in the ratio encapsulated in Himanshu Sharma v. State of
Madhya Pradesh: 2024 INSC 139, this Court is inclined to allow
the bail cancellation application.
6. Accordingly, the instant bail cancellation application filed
under Section 483(3) of the BNSS is allowed.
7. A copy of the present order be sent to concerned District
Judge, by fax/mail, who shall further send a copy to the Officer In-
charge concerned, for doing the needful.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK /s-210
(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 01:28:55 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/04/2026 at 08:59:15 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)