Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandu vs Unknown on 22 July, 2026
Author: Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench: Tirthankar Ghosh
22.07.2026
Court No.35.
D/L. 241.
Kausik
(Allowed)
CRM (M) 1398 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Ballygunge DD
Police Station Case No. 01 of 2022 dated 08.01.2022 under
sections 387/395/397/120B of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 25 & 27 of the Arms Act.
And
In the matter of : Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandu
……Petitioner.
Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Goutam Dey
Mr. Neel Chakraborty
……for the State.
Petitioner is similarly placed as the other accused
persons namely, Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Karu in CRM (M) 1201 of
2026.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for
bail but is unable to refute the contention that the petitioner is
not similarly placed as the other accused persons.
Having regard to the same, the prayer for bail of the
petitioner is allowed.
Petitioner be released on same terms and conditions as
was imposed to Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Karu in CRM (M) 1201 of
2026.
2
Thus, CRM (M) 1398 of 2026 is allowed.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite
formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
