C528/1668/2025 on 2 May, 2026

    0
    43
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    C528/1668/2025 on 2 May, 2026

                  Office Notes,
                 reports, orders
                 or proceedings
    SL.
          Date    or directions               COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
    No.
                 and Registrar's
                   order with
                   Signatures
                                   C528 No.1668 of 2025
                                   Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
    

    Mr. Ravi Shankar Kandpal, Advocate
    for the applicant.

    Mr. Manoj Bhatt, Brief Holder for
    the State of Uttarakhand.

    SPONSORED

    2. A complaint was lodged by the
    Revenue Sub-Inspector, Circle Jakhera,
    Tehsil Garur, District Bageshwar, alleging
    that the concerned Naib Tehsildar
    received information from a hospital that
    the victim had visited for a routine
    medical check-up. During such visit, the
    victim disclosed that she had married the
    applicant. Upon verification of her age
    through her Aadhaar Card, she was
    found to be a minor and pregnant.
    Consequently, an F.I.R. was registered,
    and upon completion of investigation, a
    charge-sheet was filed against the
    applicant.

    3. Learned counsel for the applicant
    submits that, as per the statements of
    the victim recorded under Sections 161
    and 164 Cr.P.C., as well as her
    deposition before the trial Court as P.W.-
    1, she has categorically stated that she
    married the applicant on 31.01.2024 and
    that a male child has been born out of
    the said wedlock. It is further submitted
    that the victim has deposed her age to
    be 20 years and asserted that her age
    has been incorrectly recorded in her
    Aadhaar Card. It is also contended that
    there is no birth certificate available, and
    due to an error committed by her uncle
    at the time of school admission, her age
    was recorded approximately five years
    less than her actual age.

    4. As prayed, four weeks’ time is granted
    to learned State Counsel to file counter
    affidavit.

    5. List after four weeks.

    6. Having regard to the submissions
    advanced by learned counsel for the
    applicant, and considering the fact that the
    parties are married, a child has been born
    from the said relationship, and no objection
    or complaint has been raised by any family
    member of either side, it is directed that, till
    the next date of listing, further proceedings
    of Special Sessions Trial No. 25 of 2024,
    pending before the Court of learned Special
    Sessions Judge (POCSO Act), Bageshwar,
    shall remain stayed.

    (Alok Mahra, J.)
    02.05.2026
    Arpan



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here