Budhlal Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 29 April, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Budhlal Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 29 April, 2026

    Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

    Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

                                                             ( 2026:JHHC:12628 )
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        B.A. No.2426 of 2026
                                   ------
    

    Budhlal Singh, aged about 53 years, son of Shanichar Singh, resident
    of Village-Chanako, P.O.-Gajhandi, P.S.-Telaiya, District-Koderma,
    Jharkhand.

    …. …. …. Petitioner
    Versus
    The State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Opposite Party

    SPONSORED

    ——

    CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

    ——

          For the Petitioner         : Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate
          For the State              : Mr. V.K. Vashishta, Spl.P.P
                                           ------
         Order No.03 Dated- 29-04-2026
                Heard the parties.
    

    The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection
    with Telaiya P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 registered for the offences
    punishable under Sections 8(b), 15, 17, 18, 22, 27, 29 of NDPS Act.

    The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation
    against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cultivation of
    poppy crops. It is next submitted that the allegations against the
    petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the charge sheet has been
    submitted, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further
    submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the
    case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the
    informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the
    trial of the case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal
    antecedent as has been mentioned in para-18 of this bail application. It is
    lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since
    18.01.2026 as is evident from para-19 of this bail application. Hence, it
    is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

    The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
    Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
    discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on
    bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on
    furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with
    two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions
    Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Koderma in connection with
    Telaiya P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner
    will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile
    number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that
    he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with
    further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the
    witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

    (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
    29/04/2026
    Abhiraj/



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here