Brahmjeet Kaushal vs Union Of India And Ors on 13 March, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    (1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article

    226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, for issuing a writ of certiorari

    SPONSORED

    quashing the impugned order dated 27.06.2019 (Annexure P5) whereby the

    services of the respondents have been discharged from 14.12.2018 and for

    directing the respondents to grant all consequential benefits from 15.12.2018.

    (2). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was

    working as Branch Manager MMGS-III at Panipat and while in service, an FIR

    No.314 dated 27.05.2000 was registered under Section 304-B/406/498-A IPC

    against him and his family members wherein there were allegations of demand

    of dowry and abetment for committing suicide by the deceased-wife. He

    submits that the Sessions Court vide judgment dated 28.10.2002 (Annexure P2)

    acquitted the petitioner under Sections 304-B and 406 IPC but was held guilty

    1 of 13

    under Section 498-A IPC and was sentenced to under RI for 3 years with fine of

    Rs.5000/-. Resultantly, the respondent-Bank vide impugned order dated

    19.06.2019 discharged the petitioner from service on the ground that the

    conviction under Section 498-A IPC amounts to offence involving moral

    turpitude, w.e.f. 14.12.2018 the date on which the trial court judgment assailed

    by the petitioner in CRA-S-1783-SB-2002 was upheld by a Division Bench of

    this Court vide judgment dated 14.12.2018.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here