Biswajit Mondal &Ors vs Unknown on 22 July, 2026

    0
    9
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

    Biswajit Mondal &Ors vs Unknown on 22 July, 2026

    Author: Tirthankar Ghosh

    Bench: Tirthankar Ghosh

    22.07.2026
    Serial no. 683
      [G.S.D]
    
    
    
    
                                  CRM (A) 1799 of 2026
                     In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under
                     Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Bhagwanpur PS
                     Case No. 87 of 2026 dated 17.02.2026 u/s 85/103(1)/3(5)
                     of the BNS, 2023 and sections 3/4 of the DP Act [GR No. 198
                     of 2026].
                                               -And-
    
                     In the matter of : Biswajit Mondal &Ors.
                                                                     ... Petitioner(s)
    
    
                     Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee
                     Mr. Karan Bapuli
                                                         ... for the petitioner(s)
    
                     Ms. Shalini Biaragi
                                                         ... for the State-respondent(s)

    Mr. Sandipan Maity
    … for the defacto-complainant(s)

    Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners

    SPONSORED

    submits that the petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law;

    petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law and the petitioner no.3

    is the sister-in-law of the deceased. The marriage was

    solemnized in April, 2024. The husband was arrested in

    connection with the instant case and charge-sheet has

    already been submitted before the learned jurisdictional

    court.

    Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer

    for bail and draws the attention of the court to the
    2

    statement of the witnesses under Section 183 of the BNSS;

    the postmortem report as well as the inquest report.

    Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant

    submits that within a close proximity of time, the deceased

    was compelled to end her life.

    I have taken into account the materials appearing in

    the case diary including the postmortem report.

    Having regard to the fact that the husband of the

    deceased was taken into custody and charge-sheet has

    already been submitted, I am of the opinion that custodian

    detention of the present petitioners at this stage may not be

    required.

    Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the

    petitioners is Allowed.

    Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the

    petitioners [Biswajit Mondal, Mithurani Mondal and Riya

    Mondal] be released on bail upon furnishing bond of

    Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two

    sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each,

    one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the

    arresting officer of the case and also subject to the

    conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

    and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik

    Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

    3

    As charge-sheet has already been submitted, this

    order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of

    six weeks.

    Accordingly, CRM (A) 1799 of 2026 is disposed of.

    Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.

    Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from

    the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

    (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here