Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Bhawana D/O Shri Ravi Kumar Sharma vs Ramprasad Panchal S/O Kajodmal, … on 19 March, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:11863]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1532/2025
Bhawana D/o Shri Ravi Kumar Sharma, Aged About 7 Years, R/o
Village Jirota, Khurd, Tehsil-Dausa, District-Dausa, Minor
Through Natural Guardian And Father Ravi Kumar S/o Shri
Ramesh Chand, R/o Village Jirota, Khurd, Tehsil-Dausa, District-
Dausa.
----Appellant-Claimant
Versus
1. Ramprasad Panchal S/o Kajodmal, R/o Jirota Khurd,
Tehsil-Dausa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan (Owner)
2. Rajendra Panchal S/o Ramprasad, R/o Jirota Khurd,
Tehsil-Dausa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan (Owner).
3. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Through
Manager, E-8, EPIP, Riico Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur.
(Insurance Company).
----Respondents/Non-claimants
For Appellant(s) : Dr. Ramdeo Arya for
Ms. Sweta Pareek
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Jain through V.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Judgment
19/03/2026
1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicle
Act, 1988 by the appellant-claimant (for short “the claimant”)
against the judgment and award dated 13.12.2024 passed by the
learned Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Dausa, District Dausa in
claim case No.233/2023 whereby the claim petition filed by the
claimant was partly allowed by awarding compensation of
Rs.18,24,293/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum.
(Uploaded on 24/03/2026 at 06:09:48 PM)
(Downloaded on 24/03/2026 at 08:47:24 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:11863] (2 of 3) [CMA-1532/2025]
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the claimant and the
respondent No.3- Insurance Company jointly submit that during
pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute
amicably and accordingly a settlement has been arrived at
between them by way of compromise.
3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by the learned
counsel for the appellant and Mr. Anirudh Singh, authorized
signatory of Insurance Company, has been placed on record on
17.03.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for
the appellant submits that he is duly authorized by the appellant
to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under :-
“1. An additional lump-sum amount of Rs.18,00,000/-
Eighteen lakhs only (including interest) shall be paid to
the claimant by insurance company by depositing the
same before tribunal concerns within 6 weeks from
today i.e. from date of compromise order in full and
final settlement of appeal with claimants. The said
enhancement amount shall be disbursed to the
claimants through saving bank account.
2. In case, the insurance company fails to deposit
the said amount within 6 weeks from today i.e. from
date of compromise order, claimants shall be entitled
for interest at 6% PA from the date of compromise
order, till payment is made.
3. The appeal is agreed to be disposed of in terms of
this compromise.”
4. Learned counsel for both the parties jointly pray that the
present appeal be disposed of in light of the compromise arrived
at between the parties.
5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for both the
parties and memo of compromise, it is directed that Insurance
Company shall pay a sum of Rs.18,00,000/- in all, to the claimant,
in addition to the amount already awarded by the learned Tribunal
(Uploaded on 24/03/2026 at 06:09:48 PM)
(Downloaded on 24/03/2026 at 08:47:24 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:11863] (3 of 3) [CMA-1532/2025]
within a period of six weeks, failing which the above amount shall
carry interest @6% per annum.
6. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and award dated
13.12.2024 is modified. The terms of memo of compromise shall
be treated as an integral part of this order.
7. The instant appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
8. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J
TN/76
(Uploaded on 24/03/2026 at 06:09:48 PM)
(Downloaded on 24/03/2026 at 08:47:24 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
