Baskaran vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of … on 20 May, 2026

    0
    22
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Madras High Court

    Baskaran vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of … on 20 May, 2026

    Author: R.Vijayakumar

    Bench: R.Vijayakumar

                                                                               CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026
    
    
    
                               BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
    
                                                   ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
    
                                                      Date : 20.05.2026
    
                                                          PRESENT
    
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
    
                                               CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026
    
    
                         Baskaran                                         ... Petitioner/Accused
                                                           Vs
    
                         The State of Tamil Nadu
                         Rep., by The Inspector of Police,
                         District Crime Branch,
                         Trichy,
                         Cr.No.7 of 2026.                               ...Respondent/Complainant
    
    
                                       For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deepakkumar
    
                                       For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabhahar
                                                       Additional Public Prosecutor
    
    
                               PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS
    
                         PRAYER :-
    
                             For Bail in Cr.No. 7 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
    
    
    
    
                         1/6
    
    
    
    
    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026
    
    
                         ORDER :

    The Court made the following order :-

    The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to

    judicial custody on 05.04.2026 for the offences punishable under

    Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 & 34 of IPC in Crime No.7 of 2026 on

    the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

    2. The case of the prosecution is that it is a case of job racketing

    SPONSORED

    and the amount involved in this case is Rs.53,30,000/-. Hence the case.

    3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit

    that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case

    and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

    Therefore, he prays to grant bail for the petitioner.

    4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

    respondent would submit that investigation is pending. Hence, he

    strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

    2/6

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026

    5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available

    on record.

    6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel

    on either side and also considering the period of incarceration undergone

    by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner

    subject to the following conditions:

    [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released

    on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of

    Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties

    each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

    Magistrate No.1, Trichy, and on further conditions that:

    [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police

    on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

    [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to

    the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the

    commission of which he is suspected;

    3/6

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026

    [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during

    investigation or trial;

    [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make

    any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted

    with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing

    such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with

    the evidence;

    [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the

    learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take

    appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with

    law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner

    released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself

    as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs.

    State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

    [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be

    registered under Section 269 BNS.

    20.05.2026
    rmi

    4/6

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026

    To

    1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Trichy.

    2.The Inspector of Police,
    District Crime Branch,
    Trichy.

    3. The Superintendent,
    Central Prison,
    Trichy.

    4.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

    5/6

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
    CRL OP(MD). No. 9447 of 2026

    R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J

    rmi

    ORDER
    IN
    CRL OP(MD) No. 9447 of 2026

    Date : 20.05.2026

    6/6

    https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here