Badal Chandra Mondal Alias Badal Mondal … vs Amrit Foods Private Limited on 13 July, 2026

    0
    7
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Calcutta High Court

    Badal Chandra Mondal Alias Badal Mondal … vs Amrit Foods Private Limited on 13 July, 2026

    OC-22
                                    ORDER SHEET
    
                         IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                              COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                                  ORIGINAL SIDE
    
                                  AP-COM/493/2026
    
            BADAL CHANDRA MONDAL ALIAS BADAL MONDAL AND ORS
                                  VS
                      AMRIT FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED
    
    
      BEFORE:
      The Hon'ble JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
      Date : 13th July, 2026.
    
                                                                        Appearance:
                                                              Mr. Anirban Roy, Adv.
                                                         Mr. Ashok Kumar Roy, Adv.
                                                               Mr. Debjit Basu, Adv.
                                                                 ...for the petitioner
    
                                                           Mr. Rajarshi Dutta, Adv.
                                                         Mr. Soumen Mohanty, Adv.
                                                             Ms. Kishwar Syed, Adv.
                                                             Mr. Ayaan Ahmed, Adv.
                                                                ...for the respondent

    The Court: The petitioner has preferred the present petition under

    Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking

    SPONSORED

    appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences

    alleged to have arisen between the parties out of and in connection with the

    unregistered Lease Deed dated 12.03.2015.

    Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are the

    absolute owners of the shop room measuring 898 sq. ft. on the ground floor

    of the premises situated at Sushila Niketan, Holding No. 17/727, AF-377,

    Krishnapur Hanapara, P.S. Baguiati, Kolkata – 700102. According to the
    2

    petitioner, the said premises was being used for commercial purposes with a

    view to letting out the same. The petitioner had entered into a lease deed

    dated 12.03.2015 with the respondent whereby the petitioner was a lessor

    and the respondent was inducted as lessee. Under the terms of the lease,

    the respondent was granted tenancy in respect of the said premises for a

    period of three years commencing from 17.04.2015 with an option for

    renewal for two successive terms of three years each. The monthly rent was

    fixed at Rs.70,000/- together with maintenance charges of Rs.700/- per

    month towards use, upkeep and cleaning of the common toilet and passage.

    The respondent had deposited a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- as security

    equivalently to three months’ rent.

    It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent initially paid the

    rent for a limited period and thereafter became irregular and ultimately

    defaulted in payment of the lease rent, maintenance charges and other

    contractual dues. According to the petitioner, despite repeated requests and

    reminders, the respondent neither regularised the outstanding payment nor

    vacated the premises, while continuing to occupy the same without paying

    any consideration. The petitioner contends that since the monthly rent

    payable was Rs.70,000/-, the tenancy stands excluded from the provision of

    the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act by virtue of Section 3 thereof and the

    relationship between the parties is governed by the contractual terms of the

    Lease Deed.

    Learned Counsel for the respondent states that the respondent admits

    the lease deed entered into between the parties. He does not dispute the

    agreement as well as the arbitration clause contained in the said agreement.
    3

    The parties have mutually consented to the appointment of an

    Arbitrator. Learned Counsel for both the parties have jointly suggested the

    name of Mr. Anuj Singh, Advocate as the learned sole Arbitrator to enter

    upon the reference in respect of the disputes between the parties.

    In view of the said suggestion, this Court appoints Mr. Anuj Singh,

    Advocate (Mobile No. 9830202752) as the learned sole Arbitrator to

    adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

    The appointment of the learned sole Arbitrator shall be subject to

    compliance with Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    The learned sole Arbitrator shall be entitled to fix the remuneration in

    accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act.

    A copy of this order shall be communicated by the petitioner to the

    learned sole Arbitrator for necessary action.

    It is clarified that all questions relating to the arbitrability of the

    disputes, the admissibility of the claims, limitation, jurisdiction, and all

    other issues are left open to be urged before the learned Sole Arbitrator, who

    shall decide the same in accordance with law.

    With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

    (GAURANG KANTH, J.)

    R.Bhar



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here