BA1/2077/2025 on 2 May, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    BA1/2077/2025 on 2 May, 2026

                                                                      2026:UHC:3319
                  Office Notes,
                 reports, orders
                 or proceedings
    SL.
          Date    or directions               COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
    No.
                 and Registrar's
                   order with
                   Signatures
                                   BA1 No.2077 of 2025
                                   Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
    

    Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the
    applicant.

    Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy
    Advocate General for the State of
    Uttarakhand.

    SPONSORED

    2. This first bail application has been
    moved by the applicant seeking regular
    bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.468 of 2025,
    under Sections 8/20/60 of N.D.P.S. Act,
    registered at Police Station Kotwali
    Jwalapur, District Haridwar.

    3. Applicant was apprehended by the
    police party, and from his possession,
    20.538 kgs. of Ganja was allegedly
    recovered.

    4. It is contended by learned counsel for
    the applicant that applicant has falsely
    been implicated in the instant crime; has
    no criminal history and is languishing in
    jail since 06.08.2025. It is further
    submitted that a bare perusal of the F.I.R.
    reveals that the inventory report was
    purportedly prepared on the spot. It is
    further argued that the inventory report
    bears the F.I.R./Case Crime number.
    Hence, at the time of preparation of
    inventory report, the F.I.R./Case Crime
    number was not in existence, which
    renders the prosecution version doubtful.
    Learned counsel for the applicant has
    placed reliance on the judgment of the
    Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narcotics
    Control Bureau Vs. Kashif, reported in
    (2024) 11 SCC 372, wherein it has been
    held that procedural irregularities and non-
    2026:UHC:3319
    compliance with mandatory provisions
    under the N.D.P.S. Act are material
    considerations while adjudicating bail
    applications. It was further held that
    although Section 37 of the Act prescribes
    stringent twin conditions for the grant of
    bail, the Court is nonetheless required to
    examine whether serious procedural
    lapses exist which may undermine the
    credibility of the prosecution case. Learned
    counsel for the applicant submits that in
    case, the applicant is granted bail, he will
    not misuse the same and will furnish the
    bail surety as per the satisfaction of this
    Court.

    5. Learned State Counsel vehemently
    opposed the bail application.

    6. Considering the submissions of
    learned counsel for the parties and the
    material on record, this Court finds that
    the applicant has no criminal antecedents
    and is in custody since 06.08.2025. Prima
    facie, there appear arguable procedural
    irregularities in the prosecution case,
    inasmuch as, the inventory report
    allegedly prepared prior to registration of
    the F.I.R. bear the F.I.R./Case Crime
    number, which creates doubt requiring
    scrutiny during trial. In view of the law laid
    down in Narcotics Control Bureau vs.
    Kashif (Supra), such lapses are relevant
    for considering bail even under the rigours
    of Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

    7. Accordingly, without expressing any
    opinion as to the final merits of the case,
    this Court is of the view that applicant
    deserves bail at this stage.

    8. The bail application is allowed.

    9. Let the applicant, namely, Monu
    Sharma be released on bail, on executing
    personal bond and furnishing two reliable
    2026:UHC:3319
    sureties, each of like amount, to the
    satisfaction of Court concerned, subject to
    the following conditions:

    (i) The applicant shall attend the trial
    Court regularly, and, he will not seek any
    unnecessary adjournment.

    (ii) The applicant shall not directly or
    indirectly make any inducement, threat or
    promise to any person acquainted with the
    facts of this case.

    (iii) The applicant shall not leave India
    without any prior permission of the trial
    Court.

    It is clarified that if the applicant
    misuses or violates any of the conditions,
    imposed upon him, the complainant/
    informant will be free to move the court
    for cancellation of bail.

    (Alok Mahra, J.)
    02.05.2026
    Arpan

    ARPAN
    Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL
    DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
    ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
    2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c048536544
    5e3a20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001,

    JAISWAL
    st=UTTARAKHAND,
    serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C
    5109CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66,
    cn=ARPAN JAISWAL
    Date: 2026.05.02 17:51:08 +05’30’



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here