Asis Kumar Tewari vs Unknown on 6 March, 2026

    0
    43
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

    Asis Kumar Tewari vs Unknown on 6 March, 2026

    Author: Tirthankar Ghosh

    Bench: Tirthankar Ghosh

    06.03.2026
    Serial no. 34
      [G.S.D]
    
    
    
                                              CRM (M) 2084 of 2025
                     In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                     Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in
                     connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 80 of 2024 dated
                     30.01.2024 u/s 467/468/471/420/409/201 of the IPC, 1860 and adding
                     Sections 7(a)/8/11/12/13/14 of the PC Act.
                                                 -And-
    
                    In the matter of : Asis Kumar Tewari
    
                                                                                    ... Petitioner(s)
                    Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee
                    Mr. Jisan Iqbal Hossain
                                                                 ... for the Petitioner(s)
    
                    Mr. Zareen Nasima Khan, Jr Govt. Adv.
                    Mr. Prakash Mishra
                                                                 ... for the State-respondent(s)

    A comprehensive report has been submitted by the

    State which reflects that sanction has been granted by the

    SPONSORED

    Secretary, WBBSE. Let the same be kept with the record.

    Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned senior advocate, submits

    that the petitioner is in custody for one year ten months.

    The investigation is complete and charge-

    sheet/supplementary charge-sheet has been submitted

    before the jurisdictional court.

    Having considered that the issue relating to grant of

    sanction consumed substantial period of time, I am of the

    view that the proceedings should be expedited at the trial

    court.

    Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer

    for bail.

    2

    The case was initiated pursuant to the directions

    passed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the

    Hon’ble High Court and the investigation has already been

    completed, charge-sheet/supplementary charge-sheet has

    also been submitted before the jurisdictional court.

    Having considered the period of detention of the

    petitioner which is for one year ten months as also the fact

    that the investigation having been completed, I am of the

    view that the learned trial court would release the petitioner

    on bail on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and

    proper for ensuring further appearance of the present

    petitioner during the trial only after the stage of

    consideration of charges is over.

    With the aforesaid observations, CRM(M) 2084 of

    2025 is disposed of.

    Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected
    from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

    Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
    for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all
    requisite formalities.

    (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
    3



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here