Aparna Bhatt vs Ravindra Pandey on 23 March, 2026

    0
    34
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Supreme Court – Daily Orders

    Aparna Bhatt vs Ravindra Pandey on 23 March, 2026

    Author: Vikram Nath

    Bench: Vikram Nath

                                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                            CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
    
                             TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).2565 OF 2024
    
    
                             APARNA BHATT                                   ….PETITIONER(S)
    
                                                            VERSUS
    
                             RAVINDRA PANDEY                               ….RESPONDENT(S)
    
                                                              WITH
    
                             TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).1723 OF 2025
    
    
                                                          ORDER
    

    1. Heard.

    2. The present matters arise out of two transfer
    petitions filed by petitioner-wife seeking transfer of: –

    SPONSORED

    (i) Original Civil Suit No.248 of 2024
    instituted by the respondent-husband
    under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage
    Act, 1955 and pending before the
    Additional Family Judge, Family Court,
    Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand1
    and
    Signature Not Verified

    Digitally signed by
    NEETU KHAJURIA
    Date: 2026.04.01

    1 Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2565/2024
    16:54:52 IST
    Reason:

    1

    (ii) Original Civil Suit No.72 of 2025
    instituted by the respondent-husband
    under Section 7 of Family Courts Act,
    1984 and pending before the Additional
    Principal Judge-First, Family Court,
    Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand2,

    to the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court,
    South West District, Dwarka, New Delhi.

    3. It may be noted that the petitioner-wife and the
    respondent-husband are highly qualified persons
    and are embroiled in numerous litigations arising
    from their matrimonial strife.

    4. During the pendency of the instant transfer
    petitions, this Court by order dated 8th August,
    2025, recorded the submissions advanced by
    learned counsel for the parties to the effect that
    their respective clients were inclined to explore the
    possibility of an amicable settlement through
    mediation. Accordingly, the parties along with their
    authorized representatives, were directed to appear
    before the Mediation Center on 23 rd August, 2025 to
    facilitate a settlement between them. Pursuant

    2 Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1723/2025

    2
    thereto, the parties participated in the mediation
    proceedings. However, the same did not fructify into
    a settlement. In order to make one more effort to
    amicably settle all the disputes, this court by order
    dated 29th January, 2026, directed the parties to
    remain present before it on 23rd February, 2026.

    5. On 23rd February, 2026, this Court requested
    Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, learned Advocate-on-record,
    to act as a Mediator for settling the disputes
    between the parties. Consequently, with the
    cooperation of all concerned and the persuasive
    efforts of Mr. Srinivasan, the parties have arrived at
    an amicable settlement. The terms of settlement
    have been placed on record by way of Interlocutory
    Application No. 63716 of 2026, being a joint
    application filed by the parties under Article 142 of
    the Constitution of India.

    6. The settlement agreement executed inter se
    between the parties on 24 th February, 2026 shall
    form part of this order.

    7. In terms of the settlement, the respondent-
    husband has handed over a demand draft of Rs.32
    lacs, prepared in the name of the petitioner-wife and

    3
    drawn on State Bank of India, to the petitioner-wife
    in Court.

    8. The aforesaid demand draft completes the
    agreed quantum of permanent alimony of
    Rs.42,00,000/- between the parties. It may be
    mentioned that the respondent-husband had
    already paid a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs to the petitioner-
    wife previously.

    9. The passbook of the Sukanya Samriddhi
    Yojana bearing Account No. 4151610132, opened in
    the name of the child Ms. A. P.3, has been handed
    over to the petitioner-wife by the respondent-
    husband, along with a letter giving no objection that
    the father’s name be replaced/incorporated with the
    mother’s name. The petitioner-mother has agreed to
    make regular deposits of Rs.1,50,000/- per annum
    in the said account for the duration permitted under
    the scheme. On maturity of this scheme, the
    amount shall be utilized for the benefit of the child.

    10. The parties have agreed that the permanent
    guardianship of the child shall remain with the
    petitioner-wife. The respondent-husband shall,

    3 Hereinafter, being referred to the ‘child’

    4
    however, have the following visitation and
    communication rights with the daughter:

    i. The respondent-husband shall have the
    right to personal video call with the child
    every Saturday and Sunday between 7:00
    PM and 7:30 PM for 10–15 minutes via a
    designated WhatsApp account bearing
    Mobile No. 87XXXXXX16 and any change
    in schedule shall be intimated by 2:00 PM
    on the respective day.

    ii. The respondent-husband shall visit and
    have exclusive time with the child for 3
    hours each on the 2nd and 4th weekend of
    every month (either on a Saturday or
    Sunday between 12:00 noon and 7:00
    PM) at a location chosen by the petitioner-

    wife. Intimation of time and place shall be
    given one day in advance by petitioner-
    wife via WhatsApp.

    iii. The child’s birthday shall be celebrated at
    a location chosen by the petitioner-wife,
    and the respondent-husband shall be
    permitted to participate and meet the
    child on her birthday.

    5

    iv. The child shall stay with the respondent-

    husband for 3 weeks during summer
    vacations and 1 week during winter
    vacations, either at the respondent-
    husband’s residence in Roorkee or at his
    parents’ residence in Haldwani. The
    respondent-husband shall arrange safe
    pick-up and drop of the child. Both
    parties shall inform each other of
    schedule, date, and time at least two
    weeks in advance via WhatsApp. The said
    arrangement shall continue even if there
    is a change in residence.

    v. The child shall spend the festival holiday
    during Diwali, Holi and Dussehra on a
    rotational basis every year with the
    petitioner-wife and respondent-husband
    respectively.

    vi. All visitation, custody, interaction, and
    stay arrangements outlined above shall
    be subject to the child’s welfare,
    happiness, development, and best
    interests. The petitioner-wife shall fully
    cooperate and facilitate the child’s

    6
    interaction and stay with the respondent-

    husband.

    11. The respondent-husband has further
    undertaken to extend full cooperation to the
    petitioner-wife in procuring duplicate passbooks of
    the Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) bearing Account Nos.
    3721871225, 3721868720, 3721958711,
    3721860724 and 3721866498, the amounts
    whereof were invested in the name of the petitioner-
    wife.

    12. As desired by the parties, the IIT post office,
    Roorkee is directed to transfer Sukanya Samriddhi
    Yojana bearing Account No. 4151610132 opened in
    the name of child to the Dwarka Post office, Sector-
    6, New Delhi.

    13. All proceedings in the following cases
    registered inter se between the parties and their
    relatives(as referred to in Paragraph No. 13 of the
    settlement agreement) shall stand closed: –

    (i) Original Civil Suit No. 248/2024 filed by the
    respondent-husband for restitution of conjugal
    rights against the petitioner-wife under section 9 of
    the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 pending before the

    7
    Court of the Additional Family Court Judge, Family
    Court Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand;

    (ii) Recovery Suit No. 72 of 2025 filed by the
    respondent-husband against the petitioner-wife
    under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984
    pending before the Court of Additional Principal
    Judge-I, Family Court, Roorkee, Haridwar,
    Uttarakhand;

    (iii) Child Custody Application being G.P. No. 76/2024
    filed by the respondent-husband before the Court
    of Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka Court,
    New Delhi against the petitioner-wife;

    (iv) Complaint being MC No. 894 of 2023 filed by the
    petitioner-wife under Section 12 of DV Act pending
    before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First
    Class (Mahila Court)-02, South West, Dwarka
    Court, New Delhi against the respondent-husband
    and his family members father Mr. Ramesh
    Chandra Pandey and mother Mrs. Saroj Pandey;

    (v) Complaint being for Maintenance being
    Maintenance Case No.763 of 2023 filed by the
    petitioner-wife against the respondent-husband
    pending before the Court of Principal Judge, Family
    Court, South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi
    under Section 125 of Cr.P.C;

    (vi) Criminal Case No.4267 of 2024 pending before the
    Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Mahila
    Court)- 02, South West Delhi, Dwarka Court, New
    Delhi; arising out of the F.I.R. No.465 of 2023 dated

    14.09.2023 registered with the Dwarka South
    Police Station, Dwarka, New Delhi under Sections
    498A
    , 406, 34 of IPC, on the basis of complaint
    filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-
    husband and his father Mr. Ramesh Chandra
    Pandey and mother Mrs. Saroj Pandey;”

    8

    14. Registry is directed to communicate this order
    to all the relevant Courts referred to above so that
    such Courts may pass appropriate formal orders
    closing the proceedings.

    15. We hereby direct that the marriage between the
    respondent-husband and the petitioner-wife stands
    dissolved in exercise of the powers conferred under
    Article 142 of the Constitution of India.

    16. Decree be drawn accordingly.

    17. We express our deepest appreciation for the
    sincere efforts made by Shri Balaji Srinivasan,
    Advocate on record, as well as the learned counsel
    for the parties, in facilitating an amicable settlement
    between them.

    18. The transfer petitions are disposed of
    accordingly.

    19. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
    disposed of.

    ….……………………J.
    (VIKRAM NATH)

    ……………………….J.
    (SANDEEP MEHTA)
    NEW DELHI;

    MARCH 23, 2026.

    9

    ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.2 SECTION III-A
    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 2565/2024

    APARNA BHATT Petitioner(s)
    VERSUS
    RAVINDRA PANDEY Respondent(s)
    JOINT APPLICATION FOR DECREE OF DIVORCE
    IA No. 63716/2026 – APPLICATION FOR DIVORCE
    IA No. 218492/2024 – EX-PARTE STAY
    WITH
    T.P.(C) No. 1723/2025 (III-A)
    FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 147344/2025
    FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 147347/2025
    IA No. 147347/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
    IA No. 147344/2025 – STAY APPLICATION

    Date : 23-03-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today.
    CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH
    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
    For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aneesh Renganathan, Adv.

    Mr. Jaskaran Singh Grewal, Adv.

    Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv.

    Mr. Yugansh Mittal, AOR

    For Respondent(s) :Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR
    Mrs. Santhanalakshmi, Adv.

    Mr. Puneet Thakur, Adv.

    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
    O R D E R

    The transfer petitions are disposed of
    in terms of the signed order which is
    placed with the file.

    Pending application(s), if any, shall
    stand disposed of.

    (SONIA BHASIN) (RANJANA SHAILEY)
    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

    10
    11



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here