― Advertisement ―

JOB POST: Law Researcher, DRATl, Delhi

About the Position Applications are invited for engagement of Law Researcher on contract basis in DRT-I, Delhi and DRT-Jaipur under the jurisdiction of DRAT,...
HomeAntony vs State Of Kerala on 21 April, 2026

Antony vs State Of Kerala on 21 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Kerala High Court

Antony vs State Of Kerala on 21 April, 2026

                                                                         1




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
  TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2026 / 1ST VAISAKHA, 1948
                    CRL.REV.PET NO. 484 OF 2026
        JUDGMENT DATED 25.09.2006 IN Crl.A NO.628 OF 2003 OF
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR
        JUDGMENT   DATED   27.08.2003    IN   CC   NO.910   OF   2001   OF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KODUNGALLUR
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:

            ANTONY​
            AGED 57 YEARS​
            S/O JACOB, MANJALI HOUSE, PUNNAKKA BAZAR P.O.,
            MATHILAKAM, THRISSUR, PIN - 680685


            BY ADV SRI.JOMY K. JOSE

RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT/LEGAL HEIRS OF THE COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA​
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2       SANTHOSH KUMAR A.S (DIED)​
            S/O SUBRAMANIAN, ALAKKAL HOUSE,
            NATTIKA P.O, NATTIKA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680566

    3       ROHITH A.S​
            S/O SANTHOSH KUMAR A.S, LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SANTHOSH
            KUMAR A.S, ALAKKAL HOUSE , NATTIKA P.O , NATTIKA,
            THRISSUR, PIN - 680566

    4       SUSHAMA S.R​
            W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR A.S, LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SANTHOSH
            KUMAR A.S, ALAKKAL HOUSE, NATTIKA P.O , NATTIKA,
            THRISSUR, PIN - 680566
                                                2026:KER:33128
Crl.R.P 484/2026

​   ​    ​    ​    ​    ​

                            2

    5     GREESHMA ​
          D/O SANTHOSH KUMAR A.S, DAUGHTER- LEGAL HEIR OF LATE
          SANTHOSH KUMAR A.S, CHANADIKKAL, PADINJARE VEMBALLUR,
          THRISSUR, PIN - 680671


          BY ADV SHRI.SALMAN FARIS
          SRI.M.C ASHI, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

     THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 21.04.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                                   2026:KER:33128
Crl.R.P 484/2026

​     ​        ​         ​         ​          ​

                                                       3

                                                   ORDER

The concurrent verdicts of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,

Kodungallur, and the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thrissur, in CC

SPONSORED

No.910/2001 and Crl.Appeal No.628/2003 respectively, convicting and

sentencing the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 138

of the Negotiable Instruments Act, are under challenge in this revision

petition.

2.​ Since the complainant passed away, the additional respondents

3 to 5 were impleaded as his legal representatives.

3.​ Now that it has been submitted by the counsel representing the

revision petitioner as well as the counsel representing additional

respondents 3 to 5 that the matter has been amicably settled between the

parties, and hence the conviction and sentence awarded by the courts below

are to be set aside.

4.​ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned

counsel for the additional respondents 3 to 5 and the learned Public

Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

                                                              2026:KER:33128
Crl.R.P 484/2026

​     ​     ​       ​    ​       ​

                                     4

5.​ The revision petitioner and the additional respondents 3 to 5

have jointly filed Crl.M.A No.3 of 2026 with a prayer to compound the

offence, since the issue has been amicably settled between them. It is clear

from the facts and circumstances of the case that the issue involved is

purely private in nature. It appears that the amount which stood due to the

deceased complainant has been settled by the revision petitioner with the

legal representatives of the complainant. In the above circumstances, the

request of the parties to compound the offence, deserves to be allowed.

In the result, the revision petition stands disposed of as follows:

i)​ The offence involved in this case is declared to

have been lawfully compounded by the parties.

ii)​ The concurrent verdicts of the courts below,

convicting and sentencing the petitioner for the commission of

offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,

are hereby set aside.

iii)​ The petitioner is acquitted of the offence under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act found against

him by the courts below.

2026:KER:33128
Crl.R.P 484/2026

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

5

iv)​ The bail bond of the petitioner stands cancelled

and he is set at liberty.


​

​     ​     ​      ​      ​       ​       ​   ​      Sd/-
                                                  G.GIRISH
                                                   JUDGE
IAP
                                                    2026:KER:33128
Crl.R.P 484/2026

​   ​    ​       ​    ​      ​

                                 6

APPENDIX OF CRL.REV.PET NO. 484 OF 2026

PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES:

Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
27.08.2003 IN C.C. NO. 910/2001 IN THE FILES
OF THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST
CLASS, KODUNGALLUR
Annexure A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
25.09.2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.628/2003 IN
THE FILES OF THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL
SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR
Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF THE
1ST RESPONDENT ISSUED BY NAATTIKA GRAMA
PANCHAYAT



Source link