Anita Rana vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 4 July, 2026

    0
    3
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Delhi High Court – Orders

    Anita Rana vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 4 July, 2026

                              $~21
                              *         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +         CRL.REV.P. 102/2025, CRL.M.A. 8506/2025 & 11629/2025
    
                                        ANITA RANA                                                                             .....Petitioner
                                                                      Through:            Mr. Nipun Joshi, Advocate (through
                                                                                          videoconferencing)
    
                                                                      versus
    
                                        STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI            .....Respondent
                                                      Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
                                                               with ACP Sunil Kumar and Inspector
                                                               Sandeep
    
                                        CORAM:
                                        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
                                                     ORDER
    

    % 04.07.2026

    1. The petitioner has assailed order passed by the learned revisional
    court, whereby the discharge order was set aside and charge for offence
    under Section 420/406/120B IPC was directed to be framed against the
    present petitioner.

    SPONSORED

    2. Broadly stated, the circumstances are that the present petitioner and
    two more ladies floated a company and induced certain persons to invest in
    the same, but ultimately, the money invested was not returned.

    3. Today, learned counsel for petitioner mainly argued that since
    husbands of the present petitioner and those two ladies were government
    servants, the company was floated with the said three ladies as Directors, but
    those ladies had no active role to play. It is argued today that there is no

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2026 at 20:32:53
    evidence to show that the present petitioner induced anyone to invest or
    receive money from anyone. It is contended that merely because the
    petitioner was Director of the said company, she cannot be charged.

    4. Learned APP for State took me through statements of eight witnesses
    of prosecution, who have categorically alleged that the present petitioner and
    her husband induced them to invest and cheated them. Those statements
    form Annexure A-5 (colly).

    5. At this stage of arguments, due to some connectivity issue at the end
    of learned counsel for petitioner, his audio-video has failed.

    6. For further arguments, list on 07.10.2026 in Advance List.

    7. Copy of this order be sent to the learned trial court making it clear that
    there is no stay on the trial court proceedings.

    GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
    JULY 4, 2026/as

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2026 at 20:32:53



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here