Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Akhtar Hussain S/O Shri Mohammad Yamin vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:28229]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12418/2026
URN: CW / 536U / 2026
Akhtar Hussain S/o Shri Mohammad Yamin, R/o Near Rustam
Masjid, Bahdiya Mohalla, Dihana, Police Station Aakeda, District
Nuh (Haryana)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, District Deeg.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Deeg.
4. Sho, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
22/07/2026
;kph dh vksj ls ;g fjV ;kfpdk ftyk dyDVj] Mhx }kjk ikfjr
vkns’k fnukad 23-12-2025 ¼ifjf’k”V&2½ ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk
izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&194@2024 iqfyl Fkkuk igkM+h] ftyk&Mhx vijk/k
vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 353] 360] 413 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 3] 5] 8
jktLFkku xksoa’kh; i’kq ¼o/k dk izfr”ks/k vkSj izorZu ;k fu;kZr dk fofu;eu½
vf/kfu;e] 1995] /kkjk 3@25¼6½ vk;q/k vf/kfu;e o /kkjk 3 lkoZtfud lEifRr
uqdlku vf/kfu;e esa tCr’kqnk okgu v’kksdk yhySaM vksiu ckWMh 14 Vk;j
,pvkj74&ch&6000 ds vf/kgj.k (Confiscation) ds vkns’k fn, tkdj
20]00]000@&dk tqekZuk jktdks”k esa tek djkus ds vkns’k fn, x;sA
(Uploaded on 23/07/2026 at 02:08:22 PM)
(Downloaded on 25/07/2026 at 04:22:35 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:28229] (2 of 4) [CW-12418/2026]
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kfpdkdkj dk rdZ gS fd ftyk dyDVj }kjk
vkykSP; vkns’k esa 20]00]000 :i;s dh jkf’k tek dh tks ‘krZ yxkbZ xbZ gS] og ,d
nqHkZj (onerous) ‘krZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd bl ekeys eas ntZ dh xbZ izFke lwpuk
fjiksVZ ls lEcfU/kr vkijkf/kd izdj.k esa vHkh fopkj.k fd;k tkuk gSA ,slh fLFkfr
esa ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj mDr ‘krZ ls ;k rks mUeqfDr iznku dh tk;s vFkok
okgu ds lEcU/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dh cSad xkajVh o ‘ks”k jkf’k ds fy, lqiqnxhZukek
o tekurukek fn, tkus dh ‘krZ ij okgu dks lqiqnxhZ ij fn, tkus dk vkns’k fn;k
tk;sA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu eas mudh vksj ls fuEu U;kf;d fofu’p; izLrqr fd,
x;s %&
1. Mohammad Vs.The State of Rajasthan; Special Leaave to Appeal
(Criminal) No. 1910/2024 [MANU/SCOR/31464/2024]
2. Rameshwar Vs. State of Rajasthan Order Passed on 1 July, 2024 in
S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No.2097/2024 (and other Petitions)
[2024:RJ-JP:23633]
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd ftyk
dyDVj }kjk ikfjr vkykSP; vkns’k fof/klEer gS rFkk mlesa fdlh izdkj dh voS/krk
ugha gSA vr% ;g fjV ;kfpdk fujLr dh tk;sA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;k ,oa i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd
voyksdu fd;k x;kA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us mi;qZDr Mohammad Vs.The
State of Rajasthan; Special Leaave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 1910/2024
[MANU/SCOR/31464/2024] ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %&
“Arising out of an order dated 17.05.2023 rejecting the
petition under section 482 of Cr.PC by the High Court,
affirming the order dated 23.09.2021 of the District Collector
and District Magistrate, Jhalawar, directing to confiscate the
seized vehicle under the offences registered in
Sections3,5,6,8,9 and 10 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal
(Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary
Migration or Export) Act, 1995 and Section 3 of the
(Uploaded on 23/07/2026 at 02:08:22 PM)
(Downloaded on 25/07/2026 at 04:22:35 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:28229] (3 of 4) [CW-12418/2026]
Prevention of Crueltyto Animals Act, 1960, by an FIR No. 174
of 2021 of PoliceStation Kotwali Jalahwar, Rajasthan, the
petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved of
refusing to release of such vehicle during pendency of trial
and proving his guiltas alleged. After hearing learned counsel
for the parties, in the facts of the case we direct that during
the trial, the order of confiscation of the vehicle shall not be
given effect to, and the vehicle in question, truck Tata LP No.
RJ 14 GH 4462shall be released subject to final outcome of
the criminal case and on furnishing a Bank Guarantee of Rs.
2 Lakhs and the surety for the remaining sum to which the
vehicle was insured on the date of accident and on such
other conditions as may be imposed by the Confiscating
Officer. In view of the above, the vehicle in question shall be
released within two weeks from today.
In the foregoing terms, the order(s) impugned are set aside
at this stage and the Special Leave Petitions are disposed of.
Pending interlocutory application, if any, is/are disposed of.”
orZeku ekeys ds rF;ksa esa mDr U;kf;d fofu’p; esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr
iw.kZr% ykxw gksrs gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa] ;g fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ftyk
dyDVj }kjk ikfjr vkykSP; vkns’k fnuakd 23-12-2025 esa 20]00]000@&:i;s dk
tqekZuk jktdks”k esa tek djkus dh ‘krZ dks vikLr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkns’k fn;k
tkrk gS fd ;kph dh vksj ls iz’uxr okgu ds lEcU/k esa 1]00]000@&:i;s
¼v{kjs ,d yk[k :i;s½ dh cSad xkjaVh o ‘ks”k jkf’k ds lEcU/k esa lqiqnxhZukek o blh
jkf’k dk ,d tekurukek fo}ku ftyk dyDVj ds lUrks”k dk izLrqr dj rLnhd
djk;s tkus ,oa ;g v.MjVsfdax fn, tkus ij] fd og okgu dks nhxj txg jgu]
o;] varfjr ugha djsxk] U;k;ky; }kjk ryc fd, tkus ij Lo;a ds O;; ij mls
U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djsxk] mlds jax&:i esa dksbZ ifjorZu ugha djsxk] ;kph dks
fu;ekuqlkj lqiqnZxh ij iznku dj fn;k tk,A
lkFk gh] vkykSP; vkns’k esa mDr okgu ds vf/kgj.k (Confiscation) ds
lEcU/k esa tks vkns’k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] og vkns’k bl okgu ls lEcfU/kr nkf.Md
izdj.k ds yfEcr jgus ds nkSjku izHkkoh ugha jgsxkA
(Uploaded on 23/07/2026 at 02:08:22 PM)
(Downloaded on 25/07/2026 at 04:22:35 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:28229] (4 of 4) [CW-12418/2026]
rnuqlkj fjV ;kfpdk ,oa layXu izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gks]
fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
15/VISHAL SHARMA
(Uploaded on 23/07/2026 at 02:08:22 PM)
(Downloaded on 25/07/2026 at 04:22:35 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
