Akash Mandal vs State Of Uttarakhand on 6 April, 2026

    0
    44
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

    SPONSORED

    Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

    These appeals arise from one common judgment and order

    dated 29.10.2025, passed in Sessions Trial No.05 of 2019, State Vs.

    Atul Balmiki & another, by the court of Sessions Judge, Tehri

    Garhwal. By it, the appellants have been convicted under Sections

    302/34 and 201 of IPC and sentenced accordingly, therefore, these

    bail applications are decided together.

    2. Deceased Siddharth Bisht left his house on 30th October

    2018 at 9.30 in the morning in his Scooty. But he did not return

    and a report was lodged. Subsequently dead body was recovered.

    According to the prosecution, the appellant did kill him because

    appellant Akash Mandal had romantic relations with the sister of

    the deceased, to which the deceased was objecting to, hence,

    appellant Akash with the help of appellant Atul Balmiki eliminated

    the deceased Siddharth Bisht.

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here