Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    0
    47
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

    learned APP for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

    arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

    Section 30(a), 32, 33, 36 and 41(i) of the Excise Act.

    3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    the petitioner has antecedent of eight cases under the Excise Act

    and allegation is of recovery of 6000 litres of spirit from four

    different vehicles.

    4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

    recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of

    any of the seized vehicles and he came to be implicated based
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12676 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026

    on secret information, which is the easiest way to implicate

    someone. It is next submitted that police in majority of cases

    implicating innocent persons either at the behest of Chaukidar,

    local person, secret information and confessional statement in a

    mechanical manner without holding a proper investigation. It is

    next submitted that petitioner in similar also came to be

    implicated earlier in different excise cases



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here