Abhishek vs Smt. Keerti on 9 March, 2026

    0
    59
    ADVERTISEMENT

    With the consent of the parties, matter is heard finally.

    SPONSORED

    2. The present Criminal Revision has been filed u/s 397/401 of
    Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 challenging the order dated 16.06.2023
    passed by learned Second Additional Sessions Judge to the Court of
    First Additional Sessions Judge, Basoda, District Vidisha in Criminal
    Appeal No.87/2022, whereby the order dated 23.11.2022 passed by
    JMFC, Ganjbasoda, Vidisha in MJCR No.47/2022, partly allowing the
    application filed by the respondent no.1 u/s 12 r/w Section 23 of

    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter
    referred as DV Act), has been affirmed.

    3. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents herein filed an
    application u/s 12 of D.V Act along with interim application u/s 23 of
    D.V. Act before the JMFC, Ganjbasoda alleging therein that she was
    married with the petitioner on 11.03.2012 at Ganjbasoda according to
    Hindu Rights and Customs. Out of the said wedlock, respondent no.2
    (daughter) was born. After about 4 years of marital life, the petitioner
    started quarreling over trivial issues, prevented the wife from visiting
    her parental home, threatened to oust her from the matrimonial home,
    and failed to provide maintenance since, 2017. There were persistent
    demands and cruelty by the petitioner. As per the respondent she is
    victim of domestic violence, hence prayed for interim and final orders
    for monetary relief of Rs.40,000/- pm for respondent no.1 and
    Rs.20,000/- pm for respondent no.2, as well as residence orders.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here