Abdul Bari Ganie vs Ghulam Hassan Dar on 24 April, 2026

    0
    35
    ADVERTISEMENT

    24.04.2026

    CrlM(570/2026)
    For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and the
    requirement of filing the certified copy of impugned order dated 30.01.2024
    is dispensed with for the time being. The applicant/petitioner shall file the
    same by or before the next date of hearing. CrlM disposed of.

    SPONSORED

    CRM(M) 245/2026
    CrlM(571/2026)

    Notice.

    Mr. M. Amin Khan Advocate appearing for respondent waives notice.
    Copy of the petition be provided to him during the course of this week.
    After hearing both the parties, it appears to be a case where the
    petitioner has suffered a concurrent finding of fact by which he has been held
    guilty of offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I. Act),
    which finding of conviction and approval by the appellate court is called in

    It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the finding returned by
    the Trial court is clearly erroneous and even the Appellate court has not
    appreciated the matter in its entirety. He further submitted that he had already

    CRM(M) 245/2026
    CrlM(571/2026)

    deposited Rs. 7.50 lacs before the Trial court as well as the Appellate court
    and is ready to discharge the liability of Rs. 10.00 lacs which is controverted
    by the other side.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here