Posted inLocal Government Laws
In Sathi Kumari v. The Secretary, Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and Ors. [2024: KER:47545], the High Court of Kerala clarified that a ‘Vacation Notice‘ issued after a Confirmation Order under Section 406 (3) of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 (KMA), cannot be challenged under Section 509(6) of the KMA.
The High Court reasoned that unless the initial Confirmation Order issued under Section 406 (3) of the KMA, is challenged within the stipulated time, no appeal shall lie against the subsequent Vacation Notice issued merely for informational purpose.
The High Court upheld the Local Self Government Tribunal’s decision that the appeal against the Vacation Notice was not maintainable.
Post Views: 46
