Rafiq Alias Raffi S/O Jain Khan vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 July, 2026

    0
    3
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

    Rafiq Alias Raffi S/O Jain Khan vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 July, 2026

    [2026:RJ-JP:26728]
    
            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                        BENCH AT JAIPUR
    
         S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8745/2026
                          URN: CRLMB / 16025U / 2026
    Rafiq Alias Raffi S/o Jain Khan, R/o Gram Ganvdi, Police Station
    Jurhera, District District Deeg.
    (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
                                                              ----Accused-Petitioner
                                          Versus
    State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                      ----Respondent
    For Petitioner(s)           :    Mr. Surendra Singh
                                     Mr. Anoop Kumar
    For Respondent(s)           :    Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A.
    
    
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
                               Judgment / Order
    
    15/07/2026
    
    

    1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483

    BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 29.05.2026 passed by

    SPONSORED

    learned Additional District & Sessions Judge Kaman, District-Deeg,

    whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in

    connection with F.I.R. No. 43/2024, Police Station-Jurhera,

    District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 379, 411, 419, 420,

    467 & 468 of IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms (Amendment) Act,

    2019.

    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan

    has already been filed in the present case for the offences under

    Sections 379 and 411 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms

    (Amendment) Act, 2019, wherein the maximum punishment

    prescribed is five years. He further submits that only one case has

    been reported against the petitioner, which pertains to the year

    (Uploaded on 20/07/2026 at 10:15:10 AM)
    (Downloaded on 21/07/2026 at 12:34:48 AM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:26728] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8745/2026]

    2014. It is also submitted that the conclusion of the trial is likely

    to take considerable time and that the offences are triable by a

    Magistrate. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be

    enlarged on bail, as he has been in custody since 11.05.2026.

    3. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes the bail

    application.

    4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

    Additional Government Advocate and perused the material

    available on record.

    5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and

    upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly

    the fact that challan has been filed; the conclusion of trial will take

    sufficiently long time; there is only one cases reported against the

    petitioner which was of the year 2014; offences are triable by

    Magistrate in which challan has been filed and in which maximum

    punishment is five years, this Court is of the opinion that the bail

    application deserves to be accepted.

    6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

    that the accused-petitioner – Rafiq Alias Raffi S/o Jain Khan

    arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 43/2024, Police Station-

    Jurhera, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of

    them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh

    Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only)

    each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the

    stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and

    as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial

    and with additional following conditions:

    (Uploaded on 20/07/2026 at 10:15:10 AM)
    (Downloaded on 21/07/2026 at 12:34:48 AM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:26728] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8745/2026]

    (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without
    the permission of the Court;

    (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence
    similar to the offence of which he is accused, or
    suspected, of the commission of which he is
    suspected; and

    (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly
    make any inducement, threat or promise to any
    person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
    to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the
    Court or to any police officer or tamper with the
    evidence.

    (BIPIN GUPTA),J

    24/MAHIMA

    (Uploaded on 20/07/2026 at 10:15:10 AM)
    (Downloaded on 21/07/2026 at 12:34:48 AM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here