East Garo Hills vs East Garo Hills on 15 July, 2026

    0
    10
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. This intra court appeal is filed against the impugned Judgment dated
    04.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.171 of 2021 by
    which the prayer of the appellants/writ petitioners to quash and set aside the
    order dated 17.12.2019 of the Executive Member (EM) and the order dated
    16.10.2020 of the Chief Executive Member (CEM), Garo Hills Autonomous
    District Council (GHADC) was rejected and the writ petition was dismissed
    being devoid of merit.

    2. The controversy involved in the present matter is with regard to the
    succession and appointment of Nokma of Rongrekgiri A’king land. While
    the appellants contention is that the Rongrekgiri A’king solely belongs to the
    Raksam clan and the appellants are the only legitimate Nokmas of the
    A’king, the case of the respondent No.4 is that the Rongrekgiri A’king
    belongs jointly to the Rongmuthu clan and the Raksam clan and there has
    always been two joint Nokmas of the said A’king appointed one each from
    the respective clan. The respondent No.4 is the last appointed Nokma from
    the Rongmuthu clan.

    SPONSORED



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here