Wasef Ali vs Unknown on 14 July, 2026

    0
    6
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

    Wasef Ali vs Unknown on 14 July, 2026

    Author: Tirthankar Ghosh

    Bench: Tirthankar Ghosh

    14.07.2026
    Court No.35.

    D/L.02.

    SPONSORED

    Rakib
    (Rejected)
    CRM (M) 2823 of 2025

    In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of
    Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
    Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with New Township
    Police Station case no. 131 of 2025 dated 11.10.2025 under
    Sections 70(1) / 74 / 76 / 78 / 304(2) / 308(2) / 310(2) / 238 /
    317(2) /61(2) / 126(2) / 127(7) /351(2) / 351(3) / 75 / 79 / 64(1) /
    3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

    And

    In the matter of : Wasef Ali
    ……Petitioner.

    Mr. Sekhar Kr. Basu, Sr. Adv,
    Mr. Prajnadeepta Roy
    Ms. Sohini Kundu
    Mr. Debojyoti Goswami
    …..for the Petitioner.

    Mr. L. Vishal Kumar
    Mr. Neel Chakraborty
    ……for the State.

    Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits

    that petitioner is in custody for 276 days and there is no prospect of

    the trial being concluded in near future. Additionally, the materials

    which surfaced in course of the evidence including the statement of

    the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS and the statement before

    the doctor do not inspire confidence for implication of the present

    petitioner, as such the petitioner may be released on bail.

    Learned advocate appearing for the State on the other hand

    opposes the prayer for bail and submits that out of 23 witnesses

    cited in the charge-sheet 16 witnesses have been examined.

    I have taken into account the evidence of the victim which

    has been placed before this Court and on assessment of the same, I
    2

    am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage as the

    case is at an advance stage.

    Learned trial Court would expedite the process, as it had

    been doing, to complete the prosecution witnesses within a

    reasonable period of time.

    With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) 2823 of 2025 is

    dismissed.

    All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order

    downloaded from the official website of this Court.

    Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

    supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite

    formalities.

    (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here