Mohd. Din vs Amod Ashok Nagpure on 3 July, 2026

    0
    4
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court

    Mohd. Din vs Amod Ashok Nagpure on 3 July, 2026

                                                                    Regular List
    
                                                                   Serial No. 33
    
    
          HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                          AT JAMMU
    CCP(S) No. 343/2024
    in
    WP(C) No. 934/2023
    
    Mohd. Din
                                                       .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
    
                        Through: None.
    
                   Vs
    
    Amod Ashok Nagpure
                                                                  .....Respondent(s)
    
                        Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice
                                 Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
    
    CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
                                ORDER
    

    (03.07.2026)

    01. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, seeks initiation of

    SPONSORED

    contempt proceedings under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of

    Courts’ Act, 1971 against the respondent/contemnor for willful defiance

    and non-compliance of the order dated 28.08.2023 passed in WP(C) No.

    934/2023 titled -“Mohd. Din vs UT of J&K & Ors.“.

    02. The respondent/contemnor has filed compliance/status report and has

    also placed on record consideration order dated 24.10.2024, whereby in

    compliance to the order, non-compliance of which is alleged in the

    instant contempt petition, the matter has been considered and the claim

    of the petitioner was found not merit worthy with regard to removing his

    name from the list of OGWs maintained in the record of Police Station
    2 CCP(S) No. 343/2024
    In
    WP(C) No. 934/2023

    Basantgarh, as such, matter was rejected in the interest of security of the

    UT of J&K.

    03. This Court while disposing of WP(C) No. 934/2023 on 28.08.2023, had

    been pleased to pass following direction:-

    “Respondent No. 3-SSP Udhampur to consider the claim
    of the petitioner by treating this writ petition as
    representation and decide the same expeditiously,
    preferably within a period of six weeks by passing a
    speaking order with reasons.”

    04. Upon consideration of the matter, it is observed that the order has been

    substantially complied with by the respondent and in case, the petitioner

    is further aggrieved, he shall be at liberty to challenge the order of

    rejection passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP),

    Udhampur in compliance to order dated 28.08.2023, passed in

    WP(C) No. 934/2023.

    05. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, as settled.

    (M A CHOWDHARY)
    JUDGE
    JAMMU
    03.07.2026
    Bunty

    Bunty Kumar
    2026.07.04 12:16
    I attest to the accuracy and
    integrity of this document



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here