Pratibha Sakhare vs Union Of India on 26 May, 2026

Chattisgarh High Court

Pratibha Sakhare vs Union Of India on 26 May, 2026

Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas

                                     1




                                                   2026:CGHC:23493


                                                                 NAFR

          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR



                            WPS No. 4432 of 2026


Pratibha Sakhare W/o Shri B. Ishwar Rao Aged About 49 Years
Presently Posted As Chief Reservation Supervisor At Railway Station
Uslapur South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                      ... Petitioner(s)


                                  versus


1 - Union Of India Through- Secretary Ministry Of Railway Rail Bhawan
New Delhi


2 - Divisional Railway Manager South East Central Railway Bilaspur
District- Bilaspur (C.G.)


3 - Additional Divisional Railway Manager (Op) South East Central
Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.)


4 - Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager Divisional Railway Manager
Office South East Central Railway Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                     2

5 - Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer South East Central Railway
Personnel Department Divisional Railway Manager Office Bilaspur
District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
6 - Divisional Personnel Officer Personnel Department Divisional
Railway Manager Office South East Central Railway Bilaspur District-
Bilaspur (C.G.)
7 - Assistant Personnel Officer - I I I Personnel Department Divisional
Railway Manager Office South East Central Railway Bilaspur District-
Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                      ... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate
For Union : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI

Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

SPONSORED

Order on Board

26/05/2026

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226

of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 25.02.2026

passed by the respondent no. 7/Assistant Personnel Officer- III,

Personnel Department, Divisional Railway Manager Office, South

East Central Railway, Bilaspur, whereby the petitioner has been

transferred from Uslapur to Raigarh.

2. The Central Government in exercise of power conferred under

Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has

issued notification confirming jurisdiction with regard to service

dispute to the Central Administrative Tribunal, therefore, the writ

petition is not maintainable before this Court, however, liberty is
3

granted to the petitioner to take remedy available to him under the

Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty

granted in favour of the petitioner.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
JUDGE

Madhurima