Gorli Venkata Lakshmi vs The State Of Ap on 21 May, 2026

    0
    26
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

    Gorli Venkata Lakshmi vs The State Of Ap on 21 May, 2026

     APHC010283192026
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                         AT AMARAVATI                        [3521]
                                  (Special Original Jurisdiction)
    
                        THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MAY
                           TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
                                      PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
                             WRIT PETITION NO: 14692/2026
    Between:
       1. GORLI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/O. GORLI APPA RAO AGED 52
          YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.1-75, BATAJANGALAPALEM
          VILLAGE, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
                                                                    ...PETITIONER
                                         AND
       1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - TO
          GOVERNMENT,    REVENUE     DEPARTMENT,      SECRETARIAT,
          VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNFUR DISTRICT. 522238
       2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,                ANAKAPALLI        DISTRICT      AT
          ANAKAPALLI 531001
       3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI REVENUE
          DIVISION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT 531001
       4. THE TAHSILDAR, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT.
          531001
                                                              ...RESPONDENT(S):
         Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
    circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
    pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly on in the
    nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the eviction Notice in
    Rc.No.35/2025/SA, dt. 15.05.2026 issued under Section 6 of Andhra Pradesh
    Encroachment Act-Ill, 1905 by the 4th respondent connected to my RCC
    Building bearing house No.3-69, having assessment No.212313000367,
    admeasuring Ac. 0.02 cents in Sy.No.120 of Batajangalapalem Revenue
                                                     2
    
    
    village in Sabbavaram Mandal of Anakapalli District, thereby insisting me to
    vacate from such house property, without considering my Reply/Objections
    dated 16.02.2026, as illegal, irregular, arbitrarily, violative of principles of
    natural justice, without jurisdiction and violative of the provisions of Andhra
    Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and offends articles 14, 21 and 300-A
    of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to
    interfere with my possession and enjoyment over my said residential building
    property and pass
    IA NO: 1 OF 2026
          Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
    in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
    pleased to suspend the operation of eviction Notice in Rc.No.35/2025/SA,
    dt.15.05.2026 issued by the 4th respondent under Section 6 of Andhra
    Pradesh Encroachment Act-Ill, 1905, pending disposal of the main Writ
    Petition and pass
    Counsel for the Petitioner:
       1. GUNDA GOPI KRISHNA
    Counsel for the Respondent(S):
       1. GP FOR REVENUE
    The Court made the following:
    
    
    ORDER:

    The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief:

    “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly on in the nature of
    WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the eviction Notice in
    Rc.No.35/2025/SA, dt. 15.05.2026 issued under Section 6 of Andhra
    Pradesh Encroachment Act-Ill, 1905 by the 4th respondent connected to
    my RCC Building bearing house No.3-69, having assessment
    No.212313000367, admeasuring Ac.0.02 cents in Sy.No.120 of
    Batajangalapalem Revenue village in Sabbavaram Mandal of Anakapalli
    District, thereby insisting me to vacate from such house property, without
    considering my Reply/Objections dated 16.02.2026, as illegal, irregular,
    arbitrarily, violative of principles of natural justice, without jurisdiction and
    violative of the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act,
    1905
    and offends articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and
    consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with my possession
    3

    and enjoyment over my said residential building property and pass such
    other order or orders…”

    2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant

    SPONSORED

    Government Pleader for Revenue.

    3. Sri G.Gopi Krishna, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the

    respondent No.4 has authorised the Revenue Inspector to carry out the

    eviction and to take possession of the land without passing final orders

    pursuant to the notice dated 03.02.2026 issued under Section 7 of the Andhra

    Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for brevity ‘the Act’). Upon which an

    explanation was submitted by the Petitioner. It is urged that the impugned

    notice dated 15.05.2026 issued under Section 6 of ‘the Act’ is illegal, arbitrary

    and violation of the principles of natural justice.

    4. Sri T.Sanjeev Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue,

    on written instructions, submits that a notice under Section 7 of ‘the Act’ was

    issued to the Petitioner. Later, after conducting the enquiry, a notice dated

    15.05.2026 was issued under Section 6 of ‘the Act’ requiring the Petitioner to

    evict the subject land within 48 hours from the date of service of the notice.

    Otherwise, the petitioner would be summarily evicted.

    5. As seen from the record, even as per the written instructions submitted

    by the respondent No.4, a notice under Section 7 of ‘the Act’ was issued to the

    Petitioner and the Petitioner has submitted an explanation to the said notice.

    Even in the written instructions also, no speaking final order was passed

    pursuant to the explanation submitted by the Petitioner for the notice issued

    under Section 7 of ‘the Act’. Without passing the final order with reasons, the
    4

    respondent No.4 has no authority to direct the Revenue Inspector to carry out

    the eviction and take possession of the land within the short span of 48 hours.

    The respondent No.4 has not followed the procedure as contemplated under

    ‘the Act’. Therefore, the impugned notice dated 15.05.2026 issued under

    Section 6 of ‘the Act’ by the Tahsildar is liable to be interfered and set aside.

    6. In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed, setting aside the notice dated

    15.05.2026 issued by Respondent No.4. It is left open to the respondent No.4

    to pass appropriate orders pursuant to the explanation submitted by the

    Petitioner to the notice issued under Section 7 of ‘the Act’. Until such

    procedure is undertaken, the Respondent No.4 is directed not to interfere with

    the peaceful possession and enjoyment and not to evict the Petitioner from

    the subject land. There shall be no order as to costs.

    As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

    ________________________
    Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
    Date: 21.05.2026
    BSP/TPS
    5

    17
    THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

    WRIT PETITION NO: 14692 of 2026

    Date: 21.05.2026
    BSP/TPS



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here