Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Thakur & Ors vs State(Govt Of Nct Delhi) & Anr on 2 May, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Delhi High Court – Orders

    Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Thakur & Ors vs State(Govt Of Nct Delhi) & Anr on 2 May, 2026

                              $~3
                              *         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +         CRL.M.C. 2830/2026 & CRL.M.A. 11462/2026
                                        ABHISHEK KUMAR @ ABHISHEK THAKUR & ORS.
                                                                                                                               .....Petitioners
                                                                      Through:            Mr. Abhinav Kathuria, proxy counsel
                                                                                          for petitioners with petitioners in
                                                                                          person
    
                                                                      versus
    
                                        STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR.                                                    .....Respondents
                                                                      Through:            Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State
                                                                                          with ASI Anand Kumar and SI K.P.
                                                                                          Singh, PS New Ashok Nagar
                                                                                          Respondent no. 2 in person
    
                                        CORAM:
                                        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
                                                                      ORDER
    

    % 02.05.2026

    1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 01/2021 of PS New Ashok
    Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the
    complainant de facto (respondent no.2 herein) has settled all matrimonial
    disputes with the petitioners.

    SPONSORED

    2. The matter was listed today at a short date specifically at the request
    of learned counsel for petitioners, but he has not appeared. It is stated by
    petitioners that lawyers are on strike.

    3. Strike by lawyers is no ground to adjourn a matter. As such, I have
    examined the issue.

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 20:33:16

    4. In the FIR, it is alleged by the present respondent no. 2 that her father-
    in-law (petitioner no. 2 herein) took along her brother and after digging soil
    under a tree showed him bombs and guns and told him that they make
    people invisible in a day; and that her brother got scared and cried and told
    her the entire incident.

    5. The IO/ASI Anand Kumar from PS New Ashok Nagar submits that
    he had investigated the above aspect of possession of arms and ammunition,
    but did not find any such material. But on being called upon to show any
    statement or Case Diary or any other material reflecting that he has
    investigated such serious charge, the IO is unable to show the same. On this
    aspect, a specific status report be filed by the concerned DCP within four
    weeks.

    6. Relist on 08.10.2026 in Advance List.

    GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
    MAY 2, 2026/as

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 20:33:16

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here