Sabir Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand … … Opposite … on 29 April, 2026

    0
    41
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Sabir Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand … … Opposite … on 29 April, 2026

    Author: Anubha Rawat Choudhary

    Bench: Anubha Rawat Choudhary

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
    
                                           B.A. No. 2423 of 2026
    
                    Sabir Khan                                 ...      ...        Petitioner
                                       Versus
                The State of Jharkhand        ...         ...      Opposite Party
                                       ---
    

    CORAM :HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

    SPONSORED

    For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
    For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, APP
    For the Informant : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
    : Mr. Prakhar Kumar Vishain, Advocate

    02/29.04.2026 Learned counsels for the parties are present.

    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the
    impugned order, there are as many as 9 criminal antecedents shown
    against the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner
    has given the account for each one of them in the following manner:

                    Sl.         P.S. Case No.         Under Section
                    No.
                          1.    Chanho P.S. Case 308(4), 308(5), 352,           He has been enlarged
                                                 351(3), 3(5) BNS
                                No. 179/25                                      on bail
    
                          2.    Ratu     P.S.    Case 392/34 IPC                He has no information
                                No.277/07                                       about such case
                          3.    Chanho P.S. Case 384 IPC                        He has been acquitted
                                No.18/13
                          4.    Jagarnathpur     P.S. 386, 411, 34 IPC          He is not an accused
                                Case No.19/10
                          5.    Jagarnathpur     P.S. 25(1-b)A/26     Arms No information
                                Case No.65/10         Act
                          6.    Bero P.S. Case        115(2), 117(2),           No information
                                No.112/24             126(2), 352, 351(1),
                                                      3(5) IPC
    
                          7.    Chanho P.S. Case      399, 420, 467, 468,       He is not an accused
                                No.53/09              414, 419, 402 IPC &
                                                      25(1-A)B/35/26
                                                      Arms Act
          8.    Chanho P.S. Case         147, 148, 149, 341, Enlarged on bail
               No.71/14
                                        342, 323, 324, 325,
                                        326, 332, 333, 307,
                                        504, 506, 427, 452,
                                        447, 379, 337, 353A,
                                        120 B IPC and 27
                                        Arms Act and 3/4 of
                                        Damage of Public
                                        Property Act.
         9.    Chanho P.S. Case 323, 427, 504, 406,            He has been convicted
                                34 IPC
               No.30/17                                        but   bail   has   been
                                                               granted by giving the
                                                               benefit of Probation of
                                                               Offenders Act
    
    
    

    3. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand,
    has submitted that altogether 12 criminal antecedents have been
    reported against the petitioner which are as under:

    “1. Chanho P.S. Case No. 179/2025 Dated 11.12.2025 registered
    under sections 308 (4)/308 (5)/352/351(3)/3 (5) of Bharatiya
    Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

    2. Ratu P.S. Case No. 277/2007 Dated 13.12.2007 registered
    under section 392 of IPC

    3. Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 19/2010 Dated 05.04.2010
    registered under sections – 386/411/34 of IPC

    4. Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 65/2010
    Dated 12.03.2010 registered under sections -25(1-B)a/ 26 of
    Arms Act.

    5. Bero P.S. Case No. 53/2009 Dated 05.09.2009 registered under
    sections -399/420/467/468/414/419/402 of IPC and 25 (1-A)
    b/35/26 of Arms Act.

    6. Chanho P.S. case No.-114/2023 Dated 02.08.2023 registered
    under sections – 341/323/325/34 of IPC
    2

    7. Chanho P.S. case No. 71/2014 Dated 29.10.2014 registered
    under sections 147/148/149/341/
    342/323/324/325/326/332/333/307/504/506/427/447/452/379/
    337/353/153(A)/120(b) of IPC, section 27 of Arms Act and
    section 3/4 of Damage of Public Property Act.

    8. Chanho P.S. case No. 30/17 Dated 12.03.2017 registered under
    sections – 323/427/504/406/34 of IPC

    9. Chanho P.S. case No. 18/2013 Dated 10.02.2013 registered
    under section 384 of IPC

    10. Chanho P.S. case No. 30/17 Dated 12.03.2017 registered
    under sections – 323/427/504/406 of IPC

    11. Namkum P.S. Case No. 156/2016 Dated 10.06.2016 registered
    under sections – 414/420/120(b) of BNS and section 4 of Pashu
    Parirakshan Adhinayam

    12. Chanho P.S. case No. 34/2012 Dated 03.04.2012 registered
    under sections -147/148/341/323/324/ 504/506 of IPC.”

    4. Learned counsel for the State has also submitted that there
    could be supplementary record against the petitioner in connection
    with which the petitioner is saying that he is not an accused or does
    not have any information.

    5. Learned counsel for the State is directed to file a supplementary
    counter-affidavit giving the details of each of the cases and also
    documents to show as to how the petitioner has been shown to be an
    accused in those cases.

    6. Post this case on 15th May, 2026.

    7. The supplementary counter-affidavit of the State be filed by 13th
    May, 2026.

    (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
    Pankaj

    3



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here