Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Shahid Yusuf vs National Investigation Agency on 27 April, 2026
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2026
(@ SLP(CRL.) No.17910/2025)
SHAHID YUSUF APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has been arraigned as an accused
and seeks regular bail in connection with Case
No.RC-06/2011/NIA/DLI arising out of FIR
No.04/2011 dated 16.01.2011, registered at
Police Station – National Investigation Agency,
New Delhi, for the offences punishable under
Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and
Sections 13, 17, 18, 20, 21, 38 and 40 of the
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
3. We have heard the learned Senior counsel
appearing for the appellant and the learned
Signature Not Verified
Additional Solicitor General appearing for the
Digitally signed by
respondent – NIA.
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2026.04.28
15:54:06 IST
Reason:
4. As has been rightly submitted by the learned
1 SLP(CRL.) No.17910/2025
Senior counsel appearing for the appellant, that
the trial would take considerable time to
conclude coupled with the fact that admittedly,
the appellant has been under incarceration for 8
years and 6 months approximately.
5. Considering the above position, we are inclined
to set aside the impugned order passed by the
High Court and grant bail to the appellant.
6. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set aside
and the appellant is granted bail, subject to
the terms and conditions that may be imposed by
the concerned Trial Court.
7. The appeal stands allowed, accordingly.
8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
……………………………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]
………………………………………………………………………J.
[NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH]
NEW DELHI;
27th APRIL, 2026
2 SLP(CRL.) No.17910/2025
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION II-D
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).
17910/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 08-08-2025 in CRLA No. 1023/2024 passed by the
High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]
SHAHID YUSUF Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY Respondent(s)
Date : 27-04-2026 This petition was called on for
hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Jawahar Raja, Adv.
Mr. N. Sai Vinod, AOR
Ms. Aditi Saraswat, Adv.
Mr. Nitai Hinduja, Adv.
Mr. Raunak Arora, Adv.
Ms. Kanu Garg, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G.
Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Anuj Udupa, Adv.
Mr. Gaurang Bhushan, Adv.
Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the
following
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed
3 SLP(CRL.) No.17910/2025
order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed order is placed on the file)
4 SLP(CRL.) No.17910/2025
