Prag Bossimi Synthetics Limited vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 … on 28 April, 2026

    0
    24
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gauhati High Court

    Prag Bossimi Synthetics Limited vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 … on 28 April, 2026

                                                                         Page No.# 1/4
    
    GAHC010081162026
    
    
    
    
                                                                  undefined
    
                                  THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
       (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
    
                                     Case No. : WP(C)/2235/2026
    
                PRAG BOSSIMI SYNTHETICS LIMITED
                HOUSE NO. 4, NILGIRI PATH, R.G. BARUA ROAD, NEAR DOORDARSHAN,
                GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781024
    
    
    
                VERSUS
    
                ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2 ORS
                CIRCLE 1, GUWAHATI, 613, 6TH FLOOR, AAYKAR BHAWAN, CHRISTIAN
                BASTI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781005
    
                2:PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
                 GUWAHATI-1
                 705
                 7TH FLOOR
                AAYKAR BHAWAN
                 CHRISTIAN BASTI
                 G.S. ROAD
                 GUWAHATI
                ASSAM- 781005
    
                3:UNION OF INDIA
                THROUGH THE SECRETARY
                 MINISTRY OF FINANCE
                 GOVERNEMENT OF INIDA BLOCK
                 NEW DELHI- 11000
    
    Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. R J DAS,
    
    Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, INCOME TAX
                                                                            Page No.# 2/4
    
                                    BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
    
                                        ORDER
    

    Date : 28.04.2026
    Heard Mr. N. Gandhi, learned counsel, appearing through
    video conferencing mode, assisted by Mr. R. J. Das, learned counsel,
    for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Chetia, learned Senior Standing
    Counsel, Income Tax Department, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1
    & 2, and Mr. S. S. Roy, learned CGC, appearing for the respondent No.

    3.

    SPONSORED

    By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
    India, the petitioner assails (i) notice dated 26.03.2025 issued under
    Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as
    the “IT Act“), and (ii) the consequential assessment order dated
    31.03.2026 passed under Sections 144/147 of the IT Act.

    The impugned proceedings arise out of a search conducted on
    05.07.2022 in the case of “Lokesh Kumar Khabya and Associates”, on
    the premise that certain material allegedly pertains to the petitioner. It
    is contended that no specific seized material or nexus with the
    petitioner has been disclosed. Despite repeated requests, only a pro
    forma approval is stated to have been furnished, without supplying the
    satisfaction note or the relied-upon material. Notices under Sections
    142(1)
    , 148, and 144 of the IT Act followed, culminating in a show
    cause notice dated 11.03.2026 proposing an addition of Rs. 1 crore on
    account of an unsecured loan.

    The petitioner had earlier approached this Court in WP(C) No.
    Page No.# 3/4

    2072 of 2026 challenging the reassessment proceedings and had, by
    communication dated 18.03.2026, requested that the proceedings be
    kept in abeyance. Notwithstanding the same, the reassessment order
    dated 31.03.2026 came to be passed. Hence, the present petition.

    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
    jurisdictional Assessing Officer lacked competence under Section 144B
    of the IT Act to issue the notice and pass the reassessment order, the
    same being within the domain of the National Faceless Assessment
    Centre. It is urged that the impugned order is without jurisdiction.

    Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue submits that
    divergent views exist on the issue.

    Issue notice, returnable by 18.05.2026.

    Notice is accepted on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by Mr.
    S. Chetia, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax
    Department, and on behalf of respondent No. 3 by Mr. S. S. Roy,
    learned CGC.

    Let requisite copies be furnished during the course of the day.

    A prima facie reading of Section 144B of the IT Act, read with
    order dated 31.03.2021 issued thereunder, a copy of which was placed
    before this court by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
    indicates that assessments of the nature in question are to be carried
    out through the National Faceless Assessment Centre. Admittedly, the
    impugned reassessment order has not been passed by the said
    Page No.# 4/4

    authority. The petitioner has, therefore, made out a prima facie case.

    Even where a prima facie case is made out, interim relief is not
    to be granted as a matter of course, particularly in matters involving
    public revenue. However, having regard to the apparent lack of
    jurisdiction and the balance of convenience, it is directed that no
    coercive steps shall be taken pursuant to the order dated 31.03.2026
    till the next date of listing.

    List on 18.05.2026.

    JUDGE

    Comparing Assistant



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here