― Advertisement ―

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY DELHI

About the OpportunityNational Law University Delhi is inviting applications for the position of Academic Fellow (Legal Research). This opportunity is ideal for candidates...
HomePappu Meena Son Of Parsadi Meena vs Babu Lal Meena Son Of...

Pappu Meena Son Of Parsadi Meena vs Babu Lal Meena Son Of Nand Lal Meena, … on 24 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Pappu Meena Son Of Parsadi Meena vs Babu Lal Meena Son Of Nand Lal Meena, … on 24 April, 2026

[2026:RJ-JP:17510]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

            S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1810/2020

Pappu Meena S/o Parsadi Meena, aged about 42 years, R/o
Beelbad Ki Jhopdi (Chodagaon).
(Owner Of Tractor No. RJ-34-/RB-0798)
                                                                         ----Appellant
                                        Versus
1.       Babu Lal Meena S/o Nand Lal Meena, R/o Narayanpur
         Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur.
2.       Smt. Ramdhani W/o Babu Lal Meena, aged about 45
         years, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City,
         District Sawai Madhopur.
3.       Hol Singh Meena S/o Sardar Singh, R/o Ram Singh Pura,
         Police      Station,    Bamanwas,            District       Sawai   Madhopur
         (Rajasthan).
         (Driver Of Tractor No. RJ-34/RB-0798)
4.       United India Insurance Company Limited, through its
         Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, 01, Ashok Circle, Alwar,
         District Alwar (Rajasthan).
         (Insurance Company of Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-0798)
                                                                      ----Respondents

Connected With
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1484/2020

1. Babu Lal Meena S/o Nand Lal Meena, aged about 47
years, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City,
District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

SPONSORED

2. Smt. Ramdhani W/o Babu Lal Meena, aged about 45
years, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City,
District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

—-Appellants
Versus

1. Pappu Meena S/o Parsadi Meena, aged about 42 years, R/
o Bilwad Ki Jhopadi (Chodagaon) Tehsil Sapotra, District
Karauli (Raj).

(Owner of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-0798)

2. Hol Singh Meena S/o Sardar Singh, aged about 30 years,
R/o Ramsinghpura, Thana Bamanwas District Sawai

(Uploaded on 25/04/2026 at 09:25:49 AM)
(Downloaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:21:48 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:17510] (2 of 3) [CMA-1810/2020]

Madhopur (Raj).

(Driver of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-0798)

3. United India Insurance Company Limited, through
Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, 01, Ashok Circle,
Alwar (Raj).

(Insurance Company of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-
0798)

—-Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Ms. Chanchal, for
Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Jain
Mr. Amar Nath Pareek

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Judgment

24/04/2026

1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 173 of

the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the judgment and award

dated 30.11.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Karauli (for short ‘Tribunal’), in MAC Case No.40/2018, whereby

the claim petition filed by the claimants was partly allowed.

2. A letter dated 17.07.2025 has been received from the

learned Tribunal, informing that in Execution Case No.13/2021

titled as ‘Babulal vs. Pappu‘, the parties have entered into a

compromise before the National Lok Adalat held on 22.12.2024.

The said compromise has been arrived at for a sum of

Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Only), and the said amount has

been paid by the owner of the vehicle, who is appellant in CMA

No1810/2020, vide Cheque No.870817 dated 07.11.2024, and

therefore, no amount of compensation remains due from the

owner of the vehicle.

(Uploaded on 25/04/2026 at 09:25:49 AM)
(Downloaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:21:48 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:17510] (3 of 3) [CMA-1810/2020]

3. Since the parties have entered into a compromise, nothing

survives in these civil misc. appeals.

4. Both the appeals are accordingly, dismissed.

5. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J

67-68 – RAVI KHANDELWAL

(Uploaded on 25/04/2026 at 09:25:49 AM)
(Downloaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:21:48 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link