Kanhaiya Alias Pappe vs State Of Nct Delhi on 25 April, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Delhi High Court – Orders

    Kanhaiya Alias Pappe vs State Of Nct Delhi on 25 April, 2026

                              $~3
                              *         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +         BAIL APPLN. 1802/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14582/2025
                                        KANHAIYA ALIAS PAPPE                        .....Petitioner
                                                      Through: Mr. Tushar Yadav, Advocate
                                                      versus
                                        STATE OF NCT DELHI                                                   .....Respondent
                                                      Through:                            Mr. Sanjeev Sabhrwal, APP for State.
                                        CORAM:
                                        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
                                                     ORDER
    

    % 25.04.2026
    File taken up today on account of 03.03.2026 being declared holiday.

    1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 417/2023 of
    PS Sarai Rohilla for offence under Section 392/397/34/395/412 IPC.

    SPONSORED

    2. Learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks adjournment on the
    ground that arguing counsel is not available. Keeping in mind the extreme
    old pendency of this bail application, which formed part of 179 such old
    applications transferred from different benches to this bench, there is no
    scope for any adjournment. On this, learned counsel for accused/applicant
    seeks a passover to ask the arguing counsel to appear through
    videoconferencing.

    3. As requested, be awaited.

                                                                                                           GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
                              APRIL 25, 2026/as
                              Present:            None for the accused/applicant.
                                                  Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State.
    
    

    4. In this second call, none has appeared on behalf of the
    accused/applicant. There are two counsel, signatory to the vakalatnama but

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 20:39:59
    neither of them has appeared.

    5. It seems that the accused/applicant is not interested in pursuing this
    bail application.

    6. Therefore, the bail application is dismissed in default. Pending
    application also stands disposed of.

    GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
    APRIL 25, 2026/ry

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 20:39:59

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here